Quantcast
Channel: The Idiot Factor: Corruption Folly
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live

US-Afghanistan War —The Futility of War

$
0
0
From the Peace and Social Justice Center of Kansas, Summer Newsletter:

         The ongoing 15 year US War on Afghanistanis a sadly perfect example of how war as a remedy for injustice and terror creates those very things. Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have died, large parts of the country have been contaminated by munitions, and nothing permanent has been built. Our taxes continue to be wasted as we build schools and roads there that then are destroyed by more battles. The women we claimed to be liberating are still bearing the brunt of war deaths and injuries. Bombing weddings and other gatherings, accidentally or not, invites retaliation and does not encourage women to go out into the world. And US personnel are still being killed. In the meantime while we wage a futile war our bridges and schools are crumbling because our taxes go to waste.
           All this because we had to start a war for revenge and now can't quit it because politicians don't want to lose face and don't want to confront the military desire to keep going no matter what. There has to be a better way and it starts with withdrawing from these wars by cooperating as much as possible with international institutions, and then using the massive wealth in the US to create a public jobs program to rebuild and clean up our country. Anything less is not sustainable.






DSA continues to build on organization plans

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
Last Saturday members of the local Wichita Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) continued organizing for the next year. The group discussed upcoming elections and outreaching to other progressive organizations. They also decided to build two working groups.
One of the more interesting ideas to evolve included taking over the Sedgwick County Democratic Party. That may sound like an over ambitious plan, but the Democratic Party in this part of the state, has been in really bad shape for many years. This goes beyond it being a centrist party that avoids anything controversial. It is poorly organized, week at winning elections and lacks any real dynamic leadership. If done slowly and carefully, it just might work.
Once again the group discussed running our own candidates as well as supporting others who are running. Brandon Johnson met with DSA members early in the meeting. He is running for district 1 on the Wichita City Council. Johnson is the founder of Community Operations Recovery Empowerment. He is also a member of the District 1 District Advisory Board and a former member of the Kansas Advisory Group on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Members were impressed with his campaign and some members said they will work on it.
James Thompson also came to the meeting. He plans to run for the seat now held by Ron Estes ("Slacker Ron"), 4rth district USHouse of Representatives.
"One thing that is going to hold you folks back is the name (socialism)," Thompson told the group.
"We know," said a group member. "But we are trying to change that".
Changing people's perception of the term socialism is one of the long term goals of the Wichita DSA. It is the groups hope that future Americans will not see socialism as such a dirty word.
Thompson explained that he is working on developing a position on Rural Kansas. He said he is still being advised on that topic. He said that he already knows that keeping hospitals open in the rural areas are a problem.
"When those (hospitals) go out, people lose jobs," Thompson said.
Thompson told the group that he is not anti-gun. That may help him with some conservatives, but not so much with mainstream liberals.
"I like my guns," he said. "I'm a vet."
He said he is very interested in turning some counties, in his district, from red to blue.
During the planning part of the meeting, the group came up with a plan to help get progressive people elected:
The basics of a socialist campaign.

1. who is the target?
2. why can DSA win this?
3. Steps in the plan.
4. How does it build socialist power?

The group discussed recruiting students from the colleges and maybe high schools. They also talked about getting kits together for students want to organize for their future.
They will include chapter building kits, magazines and other important items.
Another important topic discussed is outreach. They discussed how to approach organizations that we may be able to interact with. They discussed the need to develop different approaches to different types of groups. There are different types of events that groups put on, including solidarity action events, social events and educational events.
At some events DSA will have a table and distribute information. At some events, such as parades, we may want to bring our banner and other promotional items. At some events we will just support what they are doing and avoid promoting ourselves.
The group also discussed social activities that are both political and allow members to socialize. One idea is to show socialist oriented films. Some suggested films include "13th,""Pride".


An Open Letter to Liberals & Progressives from the Black Bloc

$
0
0
I believe everyone deserves the right to be heard. So I'm posting this. -SJ Otto

The deep state isn’t coming to save us. Trump isn’t going anywhere and it seems clear that the elites have no desire to remove him. Meanwhile war and another economic collapse lay just on the horizon, as violence, intimidation, and threats from the far-Right seek to attack anyone who isn’t loyal to the billionaire king. As tens of thousands mobilize in Hamburg, Germany against neoliberal capitalism and as both repression and resistance at home heat up, progressives and liberals must ask themselves a simple question: what side are you on? 

In recent days, the mainstream media has been rocked by the story that Donald Trump has yet again shared social media created by the white supremacist Alt-Right, and secondly that neo-Nazis from within that movement have begun to threaten journalists and their family members for reporting on the story.
Only several days before, liberal and progressive groups organized protests to demand that Trump be impeached and were met in numerous cities by Alt-Right counter-demonstrators who used violence in an attempt to push them off the streets. In San Diegomembers of the Alt-Right carried flags with racist symbols and attempted to surround protesters, in LA and Philadelphia clashes broke out, and, in Austinthe far-Right attempted to block the march’s route.
The targets of the Alt-Right weren’t just the black bloc, anarchists, or antifa–they were anyone who dared to come out that day and voice their displeasure with the president. Ironically, despite the permitted rallies hardly even being disruptive, in the months leading up to them, far-Right conspiracy theory websites such as InfoWars claimed that they would lead to violent riots backed by the Democratic Party in an effort to play up hysteria.
“THE TARGETS OF THE ALT-RIGHT WEREN’T JUST THE BLACK BLOC, ANARCHISTS, OR ANTIFA – THEY WERE ANYONE WHO DARED TO COME OUT THAT DAY AND VOICE THEIR DISPLEASURE WITH THE PRESIDENT.”
This fear mongering was then kicked into overdrive with the shooting of Steve Scalise by James Hodgkinson in Virginia, as the Right used it as a vehicle to pump up fears of “left-wing violence.”While at the center of this demonization are anarchists and antifascists, as the recent viral NRA video shows, the target has widened to the entire Left, including liberals and progressives.
All of this is taking place against an immense backdrop of rising far-Right violence, murder, and arson attacks, which have been almost completely ignored by both the media and the Trump administration. This violence is also growing in the midst of a massive campaign attacking the working class, pushing through repressive measures that defile civil liberties and the right to protest, slash taxes on the wealthy and regulations on the environment, and move billions in services and healthcare out of the hands of the poor and most vulnerable and into the pockets of the billionaires, CEOs, and 1%.
At the same time, the Trump administration has launched a campaign to gather voting information from all states in order to launch a countrywide version of Cross Check, the same system that struck millions of mostly Democratic black and brown voters from the rolls in 2016. Heading the campaign is Kris Kobach, who is both the Kansassecretary of state as well as the legal counsel of the Federation of American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a white nationalist think tank.
For the rest click here.

US Army is on an extermination campaign

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
Not long ago people complained about the prison camp at GuantanamoBay. Back then President George Bush called those prisoners "enemy combatants." he said they had no rights at all as enemy soldiers. They had no right to trial.
Todaymany years later—where are the enemy combatants?
The answer is simple­—we no longer take prisoners. We just kill those who violate our western values. Not since the US Indian Warswas there such an attempt to exterminate a people as is now being done in Iraq.
If we go back to World War II, our army captured many troops and leaders of those troops. Out troops took prisoners in the Korean War. Not today. We are exterminating them.
So what happens to those who actually surrender to US led coalition troops?, according to Independent UK News:

"Iraqi security forces kill Isis prisoners because they believe that if the militants are sent to prison camps they will bribe the authorities in Baghdad to release them. “That is why Iraqi soldiers prefer to shoot them or throw them off high buildings,” says one Iraqi source. A former senior Iraqi official said he could name the exact sum that it would take for an Isis member to buy papers enabling him to move freely around Iraq."
Guantanamobay is almost empty today. We are fighting wars in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan. So were are all the prisoners from battles we won? There are nonf. We kill them all. When it comes to leaders our US Army makes a priority of attacking and killing leaders. From NBC News:

"The leader of an ISIS affiliate in Afghanistan was killed in a U.S. airstrike on the groups’ headquarters this week, the Pentagon said Friday.
Abu Sayed, the emir of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria in the KhorasanProvince, called ISIS-K, died in Tuesday’s airstrike in KunarProvince, a region on Afghanistan’s northeast border with Pakistan.
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told reporters on Friday that when leaders of terror groups like ISIS-K are killed the groups could be set back a day, a few weeks or a month. "It's obviously a victory on our side, in terms of setting them back. It's the right direction," he said."
So we see the proud victory of an Army that takes no prisoners and celebrates every time the kill an important person.
This is nothing less than genocide. This country has decided to kill all those who don't fit in with their new global order. In this war the idea is to wipe out the people who may have differences of opinion.
Another thing missing is any kind of negotiating. Our military treats that as weakness. But we have no way of moving out of this war. There can be no solution to these wars but absolute and total victory for the US Empire who is now relying on their superior weapons. 
This is one more reason to oppose these phony wars. We know they are not about terrorism, that is a lie. This is about defending the US empire against all those who oppose it. The US started this war, not them. They are extermination campaigns and nothing less.
Pix by Facepunch. 

Women's rights in Arkansas under attack

$
0
0
From Julie A. Burkhart
Founder and CEO
Trust Women Foundation:

Arkansas is the latest state to put the lives of women in danger with a ban on the safest, most common second-trimester abortion procedure. If allowed to stand — and I can't imagine it will be because it's unconstitutional — physicians will be forced to use an unproven, risky procedure instead of a D&E (dilation and evacuation). 
Why would any lawmaker want to put women at risk like that? You know the answer: politics. 
As you also know, Kansas' ban, the Physician Intimidation and Criminalization Act, is stayed. But women face similar bans in Mississippi and West Virginia. Bans are enjoined in Alabama, Louisiana and Oklahoma. Arkansas' ban is set to go into effect, along with other anti-choice laws, on Aug. 1. A ban in Texas will take effect in September.
Arkansas also passed a law requiring women to notify and get consent from the man who impregnated them or family members about how fetal tissue should be disposed. That's essentially a work-around to require women to get permission to have an abortion. 
Trust Women fought back against the D&E ban in Kansas with the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the ACLU and CRR have filed a lawsuit to block the most recent anti-choice laws in Arkansas. 
I have deep concerns that other states will pass similar laws. What's at stake is nothing less than access to abortion care. As I've said before, Roe v. Wade may still stand —and seven in 10 Americans say it should, according to a Pew Research Center survey   but it doesn't mean a lot if women can't actually access abortion care.
On the home front, as I mentioned in our July newsletter, our Wichita clinic has complied with a new law requiring us to disclose medically unnecessary information about the physicians who provide abortion care for our patients. 

We are awaiting a final decision on the Kansas D&E ban from the Kansas Supreme Court. But in the meantime, we are fighting this law actively in the court of public opinion. Please consider contributing $10, $15 or $30 monthly as part of our Circle of Trust. Monthly contributions not only keep our costs low, but they also mean we can broadcast the dangers of such abortion bans across the country with media statements, op-ed pieces and individual conversations.

Why should we care about the health of John McCain?

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
While nearly the whole mainstream press and politicians from both parties are honouring John McCain for his bravery and dedicated service to the American Government, and remember he was a war hero, some of us are not impressed.
The man has brain cancer and if he was one of his less wealthy constituents, he would be screwed. He would either die from lack of health care or he would lose everything he owned trying to raise the money he needs for his very expensive treatment.
The legislators have their own free medical care that the average American can only dream of. And McCain rushed to work today so he can help President Donald Trump pass a new law that will cost millions of Americans their health care. For the needy there is no reason to "hope he gets well soon." There is no reason to care about his health at all. He doesn't care about the health of others, so why are we supposed to care about him. If he wants our sympathy, maybe he should vote against the Republican repeal and replacement of Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act is heavily flawed, but  McCain and his allies are about to take away what little health care poor people have.

As for McCain being a war hero, he has promoted war all around the world. It is hard to treat him as a hero when he has promoted war and its destruction on various world societies. Did he learn nothing from his time in North Vietnam? According to Anti-Media McCain's list of war crimes include:

Afghanistan and Iraq
Obviously every US senator (besides California’s Barbara Lee) voted to give president George W. Bush the power to invade Afghanistan following the events of September 11th. However, McCain wasn’t happy with just moving to invade Afghanistan. No, he had other targets on his mind as early as the day after the towers fell.
Despite McCain’s claim in 2014 that “the Iraq war probably wouldn’t have happened” if he had won the 2000 Republican primary and then general election, this assertion seems ridiculous. On September 12th 2001, McCain appeared on MSNBC presenting a long list of countries he felt were providing a “safe harbor” to groups like al Qaeda. This list of course included Iraq and several other countries that appear later on this list.

Syria

Another country on that 2001 list (of course) was Syria. Now, the Bush regime may have never gotten a chance to continue toppling Mideast countries (thanks to the failure in Iraq and the exposure of that war being sold on lies). But McCain seemingly never lost sight of his hatred for Bashar Al-Assad.

Shortly after the Arab Spring “broke out” in Syria, McCain – and his constant partner in war crimes Sen. Lindsey Graham – quickly found communication channels with the “Syrian opposition.” Just a few short months after the US endorsed protests in Syria (even having their ambassador attend), McCain and Graham began calling for arms to start flowing to the Free Syrian Army and other “rebel” groups.

Libya

McCain’s plans for Syria never quite worked the way he wanted but he probably should’ve know they would never yield a positive result. If McCain didn’t want to look at Iraq to prove that point, he had another more recent example he could’ve used: the NATO intervention in Libya.
It was less than a year before McCain wanted to arm Syrian takfiris that he had supported with the bombing and no fly zones in Libya. McCain even wanted tougher actions against the country. Which has now become an anarchic Wild West that’s home to all sorts of horrors from the Islamic State to a new slave trade.

West and Central Africa

McCain is also a champion of the “war on terror” in other parts of Africa. While McCain hasn’t directly supported terrorists in some countries in Africa, he still has called for more US intervention across the continent.
This list includes countries dealing with Islamic insurgencies, such as Mali. McCain has also called for plans like “deploying Special Forces” to rescue girls kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria and intervention in Sudan, where McCain and his wife have invested money for some time.

Iran

Another country on the list of hated nations originally put forth by Bush undersecretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz, and also another long time target of McCain, is of course Iran.
Although McCain has always said “he prays” there will never be at war with Iran, the man constantly calls for it and even jokes about bombing the country when he feels the mood is right. The truth of the matter is, McCain’s positions towards Iran are so hostile that even flagship neoconservative institutions like the Cato Institute think he is too hawkish....

...Ukraine

Don’t be fooled into thinking that McCain only supports jihadists in Eastern Europe though! He also backs the overt Nazis acting as death squads for Kiev in the ongoing Ukrainian conflict.
This of course started in 2014, but McCain has continued to pledge support for Kiev’s crimes in the Donbass region to this day. This is all par for the course in McCain’s larger theme of challenging Russia– the country he believes controls the separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Russia

The story of McCain’s hatred of Russia spans back to the Cold War. We won’t get into McCain’s fear of communism that’s evolved into just general Russophobia. But we will say he didn’t have many excuses to focus on making threats towards Moscow for a good 15-20 year stretch.
This changed in 2008, with the war in South Ossetia between Georgia and Russia. During this conflict McCain was the loudest voice saying the US “should immediately call a meeting of the North Atlantic Council to assess Georgia’s security and review measures NATO can take to contribute to stabilizing this very dangerous situation.”
This same situation repeated in Ukraine in 2014 but McCain’s worst comments came this year. As soon as the US Intelligence Community’s accused Russia of interference in the 2016 US elections– and without any evidence– McCain was first to say the event was an “act of war.”

North Korea

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DRPK/North Korea) was also an early target of McCain’s making his September 12th wish list. More recently though, the restyled “Trump opponent” McCain was all-in on the new regime’s saber rattling. Calling on Trump to strike the nuclear armed country.


Urban sprawl in West Wichita continues—clutter, clutter and more clutter

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
It seems like every Summer I write about urban sprawl and the lack of open spaces in my part of SedgwickCounty. So why should this year be any different?
When I moved to Maize, KS almost 20 years ago, it was a lot like living in the country. There used to be an open field across the street from me. Maize Road went from my house, to a stop light south of me. From there Maize was a 55 mile per hour stretch of black top road that went through empty lots—wide open spaces with wheat, weeds or something else along the way to 21st Street. It was like most stretches of road in the country—wide open spaces and a few tree lines along the farmed areas.
Today there is a 40 mile per hour four lane road blacktop road lined with either strip malls, large superstores such as Menards, Sam's Club or Lowe's Home Improvement, or buildings still being built. It looks like there is a contest to see who can cram the most buildings on every single site along the road from 53 Street in Maize towards 21st Street.  
There are about four stoplights now. And I dread driving down to the corner of 21st and Maize where New Market Square, is a mega market that has lots of useless crap I will never want or use and where such mega-rip offs as Wal-Mart are located.
My front yard is about 1/4th gone. The once lazy road in front is now a busy street. The noise and light pollution are never ending.
Once empty spaces of wheat or prairie grass. Now just urban clutter.

There is a new plan for a park along the road were Cadillac lake[1]used to be. It sounds like a good idea.  
According toThe Wichita Eagle:

Seeking to balance nature and commercial development in an ecologically sensitive area, the Wichita City Council reviewed plans this week for a $7.2 million wetland park to be built at CadillacLake in northwest Wichita.
The primary features of the park will be flood-proof galvanized steel boardwalks and wildlife observation stations modeled on the leaves of native lotus plants, said Hans Klein-Hewett, landscape architect with RDg Planning and Design, the company hired by the city to design the park.
The park is planned for a wetlands area near Maize Road and 29th Street North.
This all sounds great. At fist the city originally decided to move CadillacLake somewhere else, years ago, so the rush to develop all this land was not compromised by actual wildlife. The new plans look OK, but lets look at how the city did with Wichita's WaterWalk. It was suppose to give us something like they have in San Antonio, Texas, with all those neat canals and boats. After 15 years and $41 million in taxpayer subsidies to the WaterWalk, the city of Wichita has gotten no money from a profit-sharing agreement attached to the development deal. The canals aren't built. The developers just took a lot of city development money and they ran. So what if they do that out here? What if our water park is just one more city development rip off. Tax payers like me will get another area of blight to stare at.
This place already looks like clutter. There is nothing but strip malls  with large mega stores behind them. It looks like shit. A once beautiful country drive is now a cluttered clusterfuck of businesses and buildings of which most of them I will never make use of.
More clutter and traffic lights.

I live in a county where most of the people vote for knuckle headed backward people who haven't studied anything new on city development since the 1950s. They are stupid dolts who couldn't plan a modern city if their life depended on it.
So the rest of us pay. We have ugly over-development. The natural beauty of this land is being ruined by these stupid dolts.
I guess for now all I can do is just put up with it and hope they might actually do what they have promised to do with the CadillacLakePark. They might get it right for once in their lives. But I'm not holding my breath.
An endless stream of clutter.


The actual Cadillac Lake before it is gone- Last picture by KMUW.




[1]CadillacLake used to be a kind of swamp that was used by migratory birds. Ecologist over the years have tried to preserve this lake as it has been an important stop over point for migratory birds. There have always been the dolts who wanted to drain it and develop it for many decades. 

Scaramucci's Batting 1000- Second Day Of Work He Made A Liar Out Of Jay Sekulow On Fox News

$
0
0

Anthony Scaramucci has been on the job a little over a day and already the Sunday shows are manifesting a level of double speak and chaos to rival the days of the Tower of Babel. Presidential pardons was the talking point this morning and while Scaramucci was on Fox News Sunday telling Chris Wallace that he had been discussing the issue with Trump just last week, lawyer Jay Sekulow was on ABC telling George Stephanopolous emphatically that there were in fact no conversations regarding presidential pardons taking place at all, nor is the topic even being researched.  
Wallace: “Why even talk about pardons?”
Scaramucci: “This is one of those things about Washington, the convolution and the nature of things. I’m in the Oval Office with the president last week and we were talking about that, he says he brought that up, but he doesn’t have to be pardoned, there’s nobody around him that has to be pardoned. He was just making the statement about the power of the pardon. Now, all of the speculation and all of the spin is he’s going to pardon himself. The president does not need to pardon himself. And the reason he doesn’t need to pardon himself is he hasn’t done anything wrong.”


For the rest click here.


Venezuela- Maduro: I Am Proud to Be Sanctioned Mr. Donald Trump

$
0
0
We hear a lot of doom and gloom from the main stream press and a lot of US politicians, including our President Donald Trump. But not every news outlet has focused on such negative assessments of what is happening in Venezuela. -SJ Otto
Here is an article from Telesur TV:

"Impose whatever sanctions you like but I am the leader of a free people," said Maduro in response to U.S.sanctions.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has defended himself against recent sanctions imposed by the United States.
In a public address, Maduro declared, "Impose whatever sanctions you like but I am the leader of the free people."
The comments come after the U.S. Treasury Department announced it will imposesanctions directly on President Maduro.
The sanctions mean Maduro's assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction are now frozen and people from the U.S.are prohibited from dealing with the head of state.
Maduro lambasted the sanctions as an "imperialist attack" against Venezuela's National Constituent Assembly, ANC.

For the rest click here.

"Czechoslovakia" - sung by Black 47

We must defend Maduro and his Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
There is so much hypocrisy on the US stand against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his Constituent Assembly vote that it is hard to decide where to start. Supposedly Maduro is voting on a system that will grant him more power and damage the so called "democracy" that Venezuela has had for many decades.
President Trump has slapped sanctions on Maduro and his country. US and Western politicians, along with almost every mainstream Western journalist, have run a steady stream of anti-Maduro propaganda, as if Maduro was another Hitler.
And yet we see how phony this campaign is when we look at recent events in Turkey, where President Recep Erdoğan has just held an election to give him all the powers a leader needs to be an actual dictator. According to The New Yorker:

"On Sunday, Erdoğan declared himself the winner of a nationwide referendum that all but brings Turkish democracy to an end. The vast new powers granted to Erdoğan—wide control over the judiciary, broad powers to make law by decree, the abolition of the office of the Prime Minister and of Turkey’s parliamentary system—effectively make him a dictator. Under the new rules, Erdoğan will be able to run for two more five-year terms, giving him potentially another decade in power, at least. With a vote by the now truncated parliament, he would be able to run for yet another term, one that would end in 2034. By then, he’ll be an old man."

So where are all the sanctions? Where are all the condemnations? Where are the endless tirades demanding Erdoğan step down? The difference is that Turkey is a close US ally and a supporter of  both US capitalism and imperialism. No matter how much of a dictator he becomes, both US politicians and the mainstream press are keeping their hands off of Erdoğan.
This anti-Maduro campaign is not restricted to the US. British politicians and their news media have also jumped into campaign. Conservative news outlets have trashed Jeremy Corbyn, the democratic socialist Labour Party leader. For example, the tabloid newspaper The Sun ran an article claiming:

"JEREMY Corbyn hailed Venezuela as a model of socialism — until it brought carnage, ruin and squalor to a once wealthy country.
Comrade Corbyn has also long championed the despots who plunged this supposed Marxist paradise into bloody chaos."

 Not surprising, many conservative Latin American countries have joined in with the US condemning Maduro and his election. Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Paraguay- have joined in the chorus of their imperialist master—the US. Many have had their own problems with either left-wing political movements or actual insurgents.
At least four brave national Latin American leaders have come out in favor of Maduro and that is Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuadorand Nicaragua. Russia and China have also come out to support Venezuela. According to Telesur TV Bolivian President Evo Morales congratulated Venezuela for its successful National Constituent Assembly:

“I would recommend Mexico and Colombia make their own Constituent Assembly ... to change their capitalist system, their imperialist system,"

And the reality of this support is that it is not strong enough to counter what the US and its allies are trying to do to that nation, both in their propaganda drive and actual destructive campaigns that include sanctions, CIA support to the opposition, including encouraging the demonstrations that have gained Venezuela so much negative attention.
Telesur TV also posted an article exposing US cables published by WikiLeaks:

"WikiLeaks has published a declassified 1978 U.S. diplomatic cable revealing U.S. interest in Venezuelan oil.

WikiLeaks has published an excerpt of a 1988 declassified cable between the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Embassy in Caracas highlighting the United States' longstanding interests in Venezuela...
The cable, titled "U.S. Goals, Objectives and Resource Management for Venezuela," outlines that the main goal of U.S.-Venezuela relations is to ensure that "Venezuela continues to supply a significant portion of our petroleum imports and continue to follow a moderate and responsible oil price position inOPEC."
The release of the declassified document comes a day after U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson warned of "regime change" in Venezuela.
“We are evaluating all of our policy options as to what can we do to create a change of conditions where either Maduro decides he doesn’t have a future and wants to leave of his own accord or we can return the government processes back to their constitution,” Tillerson told a press conference.
Tillerson is the former CEO of oil giant ExxonMobile, raising suspicion his position onVenezuela has been influenced by oil interests.
President Maduro has attacked the recent sanctions are an "imperialist attack" against Venezuela.
Cuba likewise described U.S. actions as "an international plot to suppress the will of the Venezuelan people."

As this article shows, Rex Tillerson, US Secretary of State, is also a former oil executive. There is a close relationship between the US government and its corporate interests. As with Tillerson these relationships, corporate and political, overlap. And corporate interests are largely what drives US interests in the "Venezuelan democracy." Beyond human rights and fair elections there is always the interest of the free market and capitalism. Every US foreign policy decision is driven by corporate interests—that is our access to resources and markets. Those interests come first. That explains why human rights and democracy are important to the US for Maduro but of almost no  importance to Erdoğan's regime.
Maduro is part of the Bolivarian Revolution, a movement of democratic socialist parties that are trying to provide empowerment to their poorest citizens and control over their natural resources from corporations that are part of US and Western Imperialism. According to members of the Friends of Venezuela Solidarity Committee (Barbados) and the Caribbean Movement for Peace and Integration:

“We recognized and support the election of the Venezuela’s National Constituent Assembly(ANC). We also support this Assembly that embraces a wide cross section of Venezuelan People,” activists said in a joint statement. 
They also denounced Venezuela’s right-wing opposition, which is calling for the removal of democratically-elected President Nicolas Maduro, and called on Barbados and other Caribbean countries to support the ANC.
“The peace loving people of Barbados and the Caribbean will protect the Bolivarian Revolution that defends the poor and powerless people of the Americas,” the statement said. 
“This Revolution has created the condition for many Caribbean Countries to deal with our problems of energy, health, education, housing and many other social problems that have affected the poor and powerless in our region.”
Despite the fact that over 8 million people voted in the ANC election held last Sunday in support for a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Venezuela, the U.S. government called the election a “sham” and imposed new sanctions."

If there is one thing the US has no interest in, it is the rights of the poor and powerless. The US and its Western partners are government of the rich, for the rich, by the rich and financed by the lower classes. There is no empathy for any "poor people's government."
So that brings us to the conclusion of this story—where do we go from here? Our news media is saturated with advice on what to do about Venezuela.[1] With the exception of a few alternative, liberal, Marxist and democratic socialist web sites, such as this one,[2]  all the talking heads are looking at ways to either convince Maduro he must step down or just simply get rid of him—by whatever means that seems to work. In the case of the US, one of their favorite methods of regime change is the military coup. That may be hard for this country as Maduro and former Venezuela President Hugo Chávez  have strong ties to the military. But it can't be ruled out. The US has a long history of taking out left-leaning leaders, such as Salvador Allende, of Chile, with military coups. These coups are often violent and can lead to undemocratic, anti-human rights military dictators such as that of General Augusto Pinochet, of Chile. The US government has never had a problem with killing democracy to save the free market, US capitalism and imperialism.
So what do we do? Some of that is obvious. We print articles in any publication we can, which should include writing letters to our local newspapers.[3] Many of us write for blogs, with small audiences, and we need to provide honest information for those honest and thoughtful people who will take the time to look for another opinion when they realize they are being robbed of such information. We can take advantages of public forums, election campaigns and other events where there are a lot of people present and our voices can be heard.
—Demonstrations- campaigns- all need to be utilized! —
Although DSA is different from the Bolivarian Revolutions of Latin America, we need to support those countries that try to move their country from the capitalist right to some form of democratic socialism. There are some problems with the socialist movement in Venezuelarespecting human rights and democracy, but the leaders, such as Maduro, need space to work out their differences. The opposition right-wing, that is staging the demonstrations, is also not respecting human rights. We need to point that out and not allow them to run the kind of demonstrations this country would never tolerate. We need to remember how intolerant this country was of the Occupy Movement. If this country can shut down demonstrations here at home, why should we push the government of Maduro to tolerate the same kind of dissent the USdid not tolerate?
The Bolivarian revolutions may not be our ideal socialist system, but if we can't defend Maduro—how can we defend our own efforts to create socialism here in the US. It is possible that the same system that destroys a socialist movement in Venezuela may not tolerate peaceful efforts to bring leftist change to the US.
This is the perfect time to start practicing with campaigns to stop US imperialism. If the Bolivarians can't survive, how can our own socialist party survive here in the US? We must support the rights of smaller nations to determine their own destiny without the meddling of US Imperialism.    

Occupy Oakland: Police Standoff & Brutal Assault, Tear Gas 




[1]See for example: José Miguel Vivanco and Tamara Taraciuk Broner,  "What the world needs to do about Venezuela," CNN, http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/23/opinions/twitter-venezuelan-protest-vivanco-broner/index.html
[2]This is an example of such a web site, a liberal/democratic socialist blog.
[3]Don't laugh. Many local newspapers will print our letters and we get a least a quick sound bite to counter all the propaganda that the main stream press is flooding the news with. See as an example: "Killing from afar- Letter to the Wichita Eagle Editor," Artsy Fartsy, http://artsyfartsy45.blogspot.com/2017/02/killing-from-afar-letter-to-wichita.html

The curse of urban sprawl: how cities grow, and why this has to change

$
0
0
Here is another point of view on urban sprawl. -SJ Otto


The total area covered by the world’s cities is set to triple in the next 40 years – eating up farmland and threatening the planet’s sustainability. Ahead of the latest Urban Age conference, Mark Swilling says it is time to stop the sprawl

I have just spent two days in Barcelona, one of the most densely populated urban settlements in the world. There are 103 road intersections per sq km – high compared to Brasilia’s 41 or Shanghai’s Pudong area, which has only 17. Yet despite these high densities, residents of Barcelona will tell you how profoundly liveable their city is.
Visitors are charmed by the pedestrianised streets that thread their way through a maze of buildings constructed over the centuries – between four and seven storeys high, on narrow streets leading to piazzas where people sit at cafe tables or under shady trees. Many residents walk or cycle to work, and public transport functions very well.
For the first time in human history, most of us live in urban settlements – from megacities of 10-20 million, of which there were 28 in 2014, to medium-sized cities of 1-5 million (417 in 2014), and smaller settlements (525 of between 500,000 and one million people in 2014). Looking ahead, the biggest growth will occur not in megacities but these small- and medium-sized cities.
Metropolises expand and contract. It is estimated that 40% of Europe’s cities are shrinking (though this is a trend that migration might help to reverse). Even in Africa, there are some countries where the percentage of the total population living in cities has declined at various times over the past two decades.
Overall, however, our current urban population of around 3.9 billion is expected to grow to around 6.34 billion by 2050, out of a total global population of at least 9.5 billion. If we continue to design and build as if the planet can provide unlimited resources, then this near-doubling of the urban population will mean a doubling of the natural resources required to build and operate our cities – which is not sustainable.
For the rest click here.


NOW tracks the alarming trend of Democratic Party candidates who oppose abortion rights

$
0
0

From Toni Van Pelt , President of National Organization of Women:


Last week, Democratic party leaders said that they would start funding candidates who oppose abortion rights. Steve, will you help us stop them?

For over 50 years NOW has upheld its commitment to reproductive rights: that every woman should have the right to safe and legal abortion care.

We’ve challenged countless conservatives who have tried to roll back access to abortion, birth control, and other essential health services. Now the Democratic party is wavering on its commitment to protect reproductive rights. So we’re going to challenge them, too.

NOW’s activists are ready to take on this harmful policy at the grassroots, and put a stop to it before it puts women’s lives at risk. Will you make a gift to NOW today, and support our grassroots?

We’re empowering grassroots activists to advocate for women in their local Democratic organizations, and with local Democratic leaders. We have to let them know that we will not tolerate policies that interfere with our right to control our own bodies.

When anti-choice candidates get elected, women’s lives are put at risk. If the Democratic party won’t support candidates who champion reproductive freedom, who will?

We’re taking on every attack on abortion rights, from the right and left, and from the grassroots on up. Donate to NOW, and help us send a message loud and clear: we won’t compromise on reproductive rights!

Wichitans come out to rally for the victims of Charlottesville

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
People from across Wichitamet this Sunday for a Stand Up! in Solidarity with Charlottesville rally at old Sedgwick County Courthouse grounds. About 300 people attended the rally. Other rallies were held across the country.
This week the nations eyes were on CharlottesvilleVirginia, where all kinds of right-wing fringe groups came together to support right-wing causes. "Unite the Right" rally brought out all kinds of  white nationalist and supremacistsHeather Heyer  was killed when James Alex Fields Jr. of Maumee, Ohio, ran his car into a crowd of protesters. He has been booked on suspicion of second-degree murder, malicious wounding and failure to stop for an accident involving a death.
"We stand strong with our brothers and sisters in Charlottesville," said Larry Burks, President of the Wichita Chapter of NAACP, one of the many speakers who addressed the rally. "We will not be afraid."  (Below is Larry Burks addressing the crowd)

He added that President Donald Trump needs to be a leader and act like a leader. Trump has been criticized this week for not condemning the far right groups that caused much of the violence.
"I want to offer my condolences to the three people who died in Charlottesville," (two policemen died in a helicopter crash) said James Thompson, a Democratic Party activist and a candidate for US Congress. "I reject the policies of the Alt Right, the Nazis and the skinheads. For all our leaders from the president to the dog catcher If they don't stand up for these principles boot them out as soon as we can."
He added that he liked a sign that said: "Don't morn, organize."
" We condemn white supremacists," said Chris Rayl, of the Wichita Chapter of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). He said DSA works with other organizations including the International Workers of the World (IWW), the International Socialist Organization (ISO), Black Lives Matter and even the Anti-fascists, also known as Antifa. It is interesting to note that he agreed to work with Antifa because some leftist groups have accused organization of promoting violence.
For example, this was posted by Occupy.com:

"Though to many they may seem to be revolutionaries, primed to take the fight against whatever variety of perceived fascism, the self-proclaimed anti-fascists of “Antifa” are a millstone around the neck of the political left and possibly a greater danger to progressive and liberal values than even Donald Trump himself.
To be certain, while it may inspire a guttural cheer to see a white nationalist crackpot like Richard Spencer belted across the face, and may feel as though our nation stands on the cusp of revolution as swarms of black clad young people burn property and charge police lines, the net effects of these actions, both real and potential, must not be embraced as resistance mounts to Trump and rightwing populism throughout the West....

....The reasons are a mix of the pragmatic and philosophical. For starters, through their wanton destruction and rioting, as well as unbridled enthusiasm for vandalism and violence, Antifa and their black bloc tactics are in many ways an outright gift to those who advocate for a police state. As their presence has become a standard affair at demonstrations and protest rallies, their particular version of “radical activism,” replete with its threats of violent insurrection and assaults on civilian bystanders, give the domestic security apparatus and its supporters perfect justification for increased surveillance and a crackdown on political speech."

This is really a bad argument. What this says is that the state is justified if it uses police state tactics because of the black block and Antifa. To some extent protesters have a right to defend themselves. To leave it all up to the government, the police and the politicians to keep the peace is the real invite to a police state. People on the left have a right to self-defence. We have the same rights to defend ourselves as the far right does. The right-wingers don't hesitate to use violence to defend their causes.

The rally last night was peaceful. Organizers planned it that way. But many of us recognize that organizations have the right to defend themselves and often they are attacked by groups on the far right. Violence comes easy to such right-wing groups.
About 300 people attended this event.


We need some one in the US government to stand up to Trump's idiotic statements on North Korea

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
It's hard to ignore all the noise this week from our "Really has no business being" President Donald Trump. And while his statement on Democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea“fire and fury like the world has never seen” if it continued threatening the United States,' sounds bad enough, it isn't that far from what the entire US government actually thinks and wants.
The entire US government has gone along with the idea that North Korea is a "threat," totally ignoring the threat that the US so obviously makes towards North Korea. It is not surprising that Venezuela is also in the cross hairs of Trump and his imperialist oriented Republican Party.
From The New York Times: "President Trump continued to beat war drums on Friday against North Korea and, unexpectedly, said he would consider a military option to deal with an unrelated crisis in Venezuela."


And of course, there is little if any resistance to these belligerent statements from the Democratic Party. Imperialism today is bipartisan.
While North Korea and Venezuela have vastly different governments, both are somewhat to the left and both stand in the way of US imperialism and its agenda. And Trump is not just the sound of an empty can. We can't rule out that he may attack or invade both countries. If he does, it is not likely that anyone in our government, few if any legislators, will actually stand up to him and try and stop him. Trump is a stooge, but he is a dangerous stooge. It's not hard to imagine that Trump will fight for the empire.
During the reign of George W. Bush, another idiot who had no business running a country, North KoreaIraq and Iran were labelled as an Axis of evil. One of those countries, Iraq, was invaded and it is now a colony of the US empire, complete with a puppet democracy. North Korea had the ability to build atomic weapons and it made perfect sense for them to do so. It may be the only reason the US hasn't invaded that country. US imperialism seems to want to hand over all that land and its people over to the control of South Korea, which today is another example of a puppet democracy, completely built and completely dependent on the US for its survivalSouth Korea has many US troops and would likely be unable to defend itself it their northern neighbour ever attacked them. 
In August 2009, former U.S. President Bill Clinton met with Kim Jong Il (김정일). He was the first and last president in modern history to make any attempt to open a dialog with North Korea. President W. Bush reversed all dialog with the regime. Since that time our leaders claim it was North Korea that shut down diplomacy but that is a lie.
The US wants to get rid of the Northern nation and annex it as was done in East Germany. As many of us know, the people of East Germany were ripped off. Their state run companies were given to West German industrialists and many former politicians were punish for the work they did to support the regime. For years East Germans worked for less wages and benefits than their Western counterparts.
So we need to support the sovereignty of Democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea, simply to stop US imperialism. Or at least we should oppose intervention of the US against North Korea. We don't have to endorse Kim Jong Un (김정은) or his government, but we should respect the independent sovereignty of that government and its right to exist without coercion of the US and its allies.

Schwarzenegger Terminates Hate in Epic Trump Takedown Video

$
0
0
Just a quick note here:  I never liked Arnold Schwarzenegger.  Didn’t care for his movies, his celebrity schtick, his time as California governor, but this video addressing Trump, racism, Nazism, white supremacy, etc. gave me chills.  
Summoning all the charisma, humor, and screen presence that made him an international film superstar, he rises to statesmanlike  heights to tell Trump EXACTLY what he should have said and why.  He uses his own personal experiences growing up in Austria just after WWII to provide a riveting argument for why racist, hateful, “loser” causes can never be triumphant.  Please pass this on to everyone you know.

For the rest click here.

Advertising—in your face and gone is your privacy—and it is illegal

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
One thing I really hate about the capitalist system is advertising. It is everywhere. I turn on my TV and for the pleasure of watching a 30 minute or one-hour show I am interrupted with lots of messages telling me I need to buy some product or service or my life will just be incomplete. It may be insurance to keep me from dying and leaving a lot of bills to my children. It may be a message about a new kind of car that will make my hum-drum life complete if I just go and put no money down for a car that cast almost half of what I paid for my house to live in. It may be about an expensive drug that will cure a disease I probably have and may not know it.
Advertising today is in your face. You can't hardly get away from it. It's obnoxious.  And the key to successful ads is to create a perceived need where none really exists. They try to manipulate us. The bottom line to all those messages is that my life will be missing something unless I give some of my money to some one else.
There is also advertising in the newspaper and the magazines I get. When I go on line, many of the sites I go to have advertising. I even see big ads on buildings along the street where I live. But the worst advertising of all are the uninvited ads that sneak into my computer without my permission.
There are many mornings when my day starts as I click on my computer and see how many messages I have on Facebook, or how many, if any, comments I have received from one of my blogs. I enjoy the silence of sitting in front of my computer when SUDDENLY!I hear this horrible noise from some blathering ass-hole trying to sell me something I don't want. And even if I wanted it, I don't want to hear the spiel of some jerk blathering on and on about what ever it is I supposedly can't wait to buy.
I hate those same ads when I go to someone else's site, but people have a right to put what ever they want on their own site. But no one has a right to force me to put ads on MY sites or worse, my private home screen.
Some unscrupulous company is putting mal-wear into my computer and forcing pop up ads on me when ever I go on line. A company called Map Scout (http://www.mapsscout.com/) has put such malware into my computer and every time I go on line, this noisy ad pops up in the corner of my computer. It does have a sound symbol where I can silence the damn thing. Then it has a count down10 seconds, so I can click it off. I usually click the sound off then wait for the count down and click on the "X". It is time consuming. It is also annoying. Worst of all it is an intrusion on my privacy. It is as if someone has broken into my home, and forced me to watch an ad spiel that I don't want to see or hear. As far as I'm concerned Map Scout is a criminal company. It's extortion. They have stolen space in my computer to force me to watch and hear something I don't want. Unlike the ads on TV or magazines, where the ads are contained in the product, Map Scout, and other such criminal ad companies, such as Pluto TV (http://pluto.tv/embed/) and Spotlight (https://spotlight.xumotv.co), have not provided me with any product to go with their ads. They had no permission to place that ad there. They have simply invaded my privacy and taken up space on my computer without my permission. They are thieves.
I will lodge a complaint about these companies. I will get advice from my brother John on how to remove the soft wear these creeps have imbedded in my computer. Complaints will probably do no good. These companies will just ignore them. And such companies will try very hard to find new ways to invade my private computer and my private space.
It's an on going war. There is not much I can do about advertising today. But this last kind of advertising needs to be fought. We need our privacy and some corporate slime bags have gone to far in taking that away from us.
 

Kotex Classic - Saturday Night Live



New Missouri right-to-work law suspended

$
0
0
It has been a while since I had some good news to report on from unions in this country. This is one of those stories. Labor and union interests prevailed by using petitions to stop a "right-to-work"-for-less law passed in Missouri. Thanks to their efforts that "right-to-work" has been suspended. -SJ Otto

 

Opponents forced the suspension Friday of a new Missouri law banning mandatory union fees after they delivered dozens of boxes of signed petitions demanding it be put to a public vote.
More than 1,000 people hoping to block the right-to-work law rallied at the Capitol and marched to the Secretary of State's Office to hand off signatures.
Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft's spokeswoman Maura Browning said that means "essentially the rule is suspended now." If enough of the signatures are valid, it will be up to voters to decide whether to ditch the law or keep it in place.
"This is our living," said Tamara Maxwell, a union member who works at Kansas City's Ford assembly plant and was among those rallying in Jefferson City. "We should be in control of that, not one person just signing it away."
Gov. Eric Greitens and other GOP supporters have touted right-to-work as a way to keep Missouricompetitive in the fight to bring jobs and business to the state and argue it gives workers a choice on whether to join unions. The Republican governor signed right-to-work into law in February, and it was set to take effect Aug. 28.
"We passed Right-to-Work to give workers a choice to join a union,"Sikeston Republican Rep. Holly Rehder said in a Friday statement. "Union bosses are afraid of giving workers the freedom to decide if a union is right for the worker and are intent on maintaining their power to force workers to unionize in Missouri."
A coalition of union members and other opponents argue the policy would hurt labor organizations and could mean lower wages. It says it gathered more than 300,000 signed petitions to put it to a public vote. More than 100,000 valid signatures are needed to put the measure on the ballot.


For the rest click here.

As US Imperialism gets weaker, we can all play a part in bringing it down

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
It should come as no surprise to any reader that this blog has sought to fight US Imperialism at every turn. I don't agree with the assumption that only Marxists are against US Imperialism and I reject the idea that only Marxists use the term "imperialism."
So I came across an article that sheds a lot of light on the subject of US Imperialism, "Pentagon study declares American empire is ‘collapsing’,"Insurgeintelligence.
My first instinct was to believe the article is too good to be true. And this article has this warning at the end of it:

"It is no surprise then that even the Pentagon’s apparent conviction in the inexorable decline of U.S.power could well be overblown.
According to Dr Sean Starrs of MIT’s Center for International Studies, a true picture of U.S. power cannot be determined solely from national accounts. We have to look at the accounts of transnational corporations.
Starrs shows that American transnational corporations are vastly more powerful than their competitors. His data suggests that American economic supremacism remains at an all-time high, and still unchallenged even by an economic powerhouse like China."

But as I read this article I began to realize that even if it is only partially true, it opens up some real possibilities for left-wing bloggers as myself. Much of this article is based on a report the  U.S. Department of Defense produced. While it may be full of paranoid delusions and exaggeration, there may be some truth to it. While reading it, I realized that political persons, small political groups or parties and even bloggers as myself may be able to take a real part in bringing down possible the larges and most powerful empire in the history of the world.
Much of  this article deals with perceived military problems for the US. Some of them deal with such players as Russia, China, and smaller entities such as Iran and Democratic People's Republic (North) Korea. These players are huge powers. Even small countries play a role that the average person can't. This report goes one step further into the non-state entities that threaten the empire:

"Amidst the challenge posed by these competing powers, the Pentagon study emphasizes the threat from non-state forces undermining the “U.S.-led order” in different ways, primarily through information......

It’s not just U.S. power that is in decline. The U.S. Army War College study concludes that:
“[A]ll states and traditional political authority structures are under increasing pressure from endogenous and exogenous forces… The fracturing of the post-Cold War global system is accompanied by the in­ternal fraying in the political, social, and economic fabric of practically all states.”.....

Having lost its past status of “pre-eminence”, the U.S.now inhabits a dangerous, unpredictable “post-primacy” world, whose defining feature is “resistance to authority”."

Also important is this statement:

"The report, based on a year-long intensive research process involving consultation with key agencies across the Department of Defense and U.S. Army, calls for the U.S. government to invest in more surveillance, better propaganda through “strategic manipulation” of public opinion, and a “wider and more flexible” U.S. military."

While we are locked out of any kind of military option, (and most of us don't really want to go around shooting people) we can take on the system through propaganda. The Pentagon seriously believes it needs to win the propaganda war. But that is the one area we can and might make a difference.
For a long time I have resisted sending letters to my local newspaper, which happens to be The Wichita Eagle, since I live near Wichita. Since I have my own blog, it just makes more sense to try and build on it. I try to post well researched articles that provide people with the news they need to form a decent opinion on matters of all kinds of politics. But I can't really compete with the readership of The WichitaEagle. But recently I've decided to make use of the letters to The Wichita Eagle. That doesn't mean giving up on the blog. Those of us who are writers need to be blogging, if we are able to do that. The big difference between blog articles and letters are that the letters are simple and to the point. Our blog articles can be in depth analysis that provides the reader with the information they need to make an informed decision as well as being able to put logical arguments together that will allow the reader to challenge the opinions of the imperialists. An example of a letter to the editor is this one that I recently sent to The Wichita Eagle:

Time to exit Afghanistan

President Donald Trump’s new Afghanistanspeech introduced more wrong policies. Experts agree that this new policy will deepen our military commitment, but not result in victory. The truth is that we cannot “give them democracy.” Keeping that government from falling will cost this country a lot of its young sons and daughters, along with a lot of Afghan civilians — and for what? For a government that could not stay in power if U.S. armed forces left.
The invasion of Afghanistan was a major foreign policy blunder. The people of Afghanistanresisted control by the Soviets for nine years and now they have resisted the U.S. for 16 years. If the U.S. pulls out there will be some instability, but eventually the Afghan people will develop their own government and one that does not rely on U.S. troops.
What we need now is for our leaders to develop enough backbone to do the right thing — admit that invading Afghanistanwas a huge mistake and pull all our troops out. It seems hard for our leaders to admit defeat and do the right thing, but they need to do it.
STEVE OTTO, MAIZE

I didn't fill if full of facts and hyperlinks as I might if it were a blog article. It is just a simple opinion piece. The point is simply to make it known that there are those people in our community who appose the policy. It was timed as a response to President Donald Trump's speech on Afghanistan. This is the time to use all our means to provide both information and propaganda. We can and must reach out to people and try to change opinions on the US military, its adventurism and the folly of imperialist war, such as that in Afghanistan.
For some time I have felt as if we are insignificant and ignored. But it is possible that we have more power in our pens than many of us believed. If the Pentagon is that worried about losing its authority and trust among the people, maybe we should take notice. Maybe collectively we all contribute to that feared collapse the Pentagon is so worried about. Maybe the collapse could be real.

There will be more from this blog on imperialism from that same article at a later date

Hurricane Harvey likely to provoke polarizing fights

$
0
0
By now most of us are painfully aware that many of the record breaking storms are due to climate change. Most of the world's people already realize this. But there are those who just refuse to admit it, such as our idiot President Donald Trump. Of course educated people know climate change is real. Trump, and others like him, just don't want the business community to have to take a responsibility for the messes they have made. We need to keep reminding the general public that climate change is real. It is caused by industrial pollution over the last 200 years and we are already paying for it. -SJ Otto

From CNN:
Local communities almost always pull together on the ground after natural disasters like the torrential flooding that has submerged Houston.
But the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey is likely to strain America's fraying capacity to coalesce as a national community at a moment of heightened political conflict and division.
Amid the images of devastation and loss, Americans this weekend repeatedly watched stirring scenes of ordinary people organizing makeshift flotillas to rescue families trapped in the epic flooding. In the rising waters, partisan, racial and class lines all seemed to dissolve.
Yet, once the immediate danger has passed, the response to the storm will raise larger political questions on at least two major fronts: the cost of recovery and the role of climate change in intensifying the risk of such devastating storms. Each of those issues will challenge America's ability to surmount its differences enough to set a shared national direction. Like Hurricane Katrina and Superstorm Sandy before it, Harvey may demonstrate just how much the man-made gales of political polarization has diminished the nation's capacity to forge common cause against even the fiercest natural disasters.


For the rest click here.

Pix from CNN.
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live