Quantcast
Channel: The Idiot Factor: Corruption Folly
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live

Sign Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris's petition to impeach Brett Kavanaugh for lying to Congress

$
0
0





I received this E-mail from the office of Kamala Harris, U.S. Senator,
Candidate for President 2020:

I remember sitting through Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings — listening to him lie to the U.S. Senate and, most importantly, to the American people.

I remember walking out of the Judiciary Committee when it became clear that Republicans leaders had enacted a sham process to confirm Kavanaugh that quite frankly was an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice.

I remember listening to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford who had the courage to tell her story in front of the entire country. I’ll never forget it.

A New York Times article just unveiled new “sexual misconduct allegations” against Kavanaugh — and new evidence that he lied under oath and should not be on the Supreme Court.

Add your name to my petition. I am calling for the impeachment of Brett Kavanaugh, and I need your help to make it happen. Sign my petition if you agree we must impeach Kavanaugh.

So many of you were with us when we fought against Kavanaugh’s nomination last year — and I need you with me again if we’re going to correct this injustice. Thanks in advance for taking action.

For The People,

—Kamala
Kamala Harris, U.S. Senator (CA)
Candidate for President 2020



Islamic Society of Wichita put on a demonstration of articles explaining the situation in Kashmir

$
0
0


By SJ Otto
Since I cover Indiaquite extensively, both at this blog and at Otto’s War Room I was quite fascinated when I went to the Islamic Society of Wichita, this afternoon, to see their display about India’s treatment of the people of Kashmir. At Otto’s War Room Harsh Thakor has written some articles about India’s treatment of the Moslems who live in Kashmir.
As with Thakor and his political comrades, the Moslems of Wichita have characterized President Narendra Modi as a Hindutva fascist. Modi’s political party is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a Hindu nationalist party. 

According to their letter to The Wichita Eagle:

But on Aug. 5 those of us with roots in South Asia trembled to see those exact values (freedom and democracy) trampled in Kashmir, as the Indian government broke 1948 United Nations Resolutions and sent 800,000 soldiers into Kashmir, with its majority Muslim population of 10 million.
On Friday, the prime ministers of Pakistan and India addressed the United Nations General Assembly. Meanwhile, President Trump has merely asked those leaders to “work it out.” Absent moral leadership by the United States, we believe India’s commercial ties to the West, with a market of its 1 billion populations, will enable far-right Prime Minister Narendra Modi to deny the reality.



As with Wichita’s Moslems, Modi is referred to as a Hindutva fascist. So far Modi has been treated as a rock star here in the US, by the main stream media. He has been a very repressive leader.
There will be more on this later.
This table of pictures demonstrates how Modi is a fascist. 

The insults to Omar are insults to many fine Americans

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
One of the few people to stand up against the conservative tirades against President Nicolás Maduro, of Venezuela is Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. She is a black Moslem and because of her stand she has been labled anti-Amercian by a lot of US conservatives.
The heat has been stiff and at times ridiculous, with her being accused of being anti-American just for opposing USpolicy in that country.
President Donald Trump and all the scum that follow him, such as Vice President Mike Pence and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have all labelled the situation in Venezuela as freedom vs. socialism.

“Vice President Mike Pence responded to Omar's comments Thursday morning by accusing her of choosing socialism over freedom.”[1]

As a socialist I find that argument extremely insulting. Trump’s policies and those of the Republican Party and many people in the Democratic Party are disgusting to me. I guess to believe in freedom, I should worship $millionaires and $billionaires and favour letting them take the best of our economy for themselves. Then we must be greedy, self absorbed and we must be OK with letting millions of people fail in this society, not even having their basic needs met. If that is what USfreedom is about, I don’t want any of it. I have always hated capitalism and I have never considered it “freedom.”
Omar his fought back. From National Review:

Representative Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) blamed the U.S. on Wednesday for the “devastation” in Venezuela and accused America of “bullying” the country’s socialist regime.
Asked by Democracy Now! about the “U.S.-supported coup attempt against President Maduro,” Omar said that America’s push for regime change in Venezueladoes not help the country’s citizens.
“A lot of the policies that we have put in place has [sic] kind of helped lead [to] the devastation in Venezuela,” Omar said. “And we’ve sort of set the stage for where we’re arriving today.”
“This particular bullying and the use of sanctions to eventually intervene and make regime change really does not help the people of countries like Venezuela, and it certainly does not help and is not in the interest of the United States,” she added.

Although she is nearly alone in the US House, on this policy, there are people all across this nation that agree with her. According to some at Fox and Republicans and some Democrats, people who oppose removing Maduro forcefully are anti-American. And there are a lot of people who oppose that policy, which means there are a lot of Americans as I and we are all anti-American.
Typical of comments about Omar include:

“I think what’s particularly disturbing about Omar’s position on the Maduro regime, which she has maintained since her first month in office, is how it contrasts with her position on Israel. She doesn’t support sanctions on Venezuela to force Maduro out, but she does support the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement against Israel, a subject that has been covered extensively here at Legal Insurrection.
Would now be a good time to remind everyone that in spite of Omar’s repeated use of anti-Semitic tropes, her anti-America blame games, and her defenses of oppressive dictators like Maduro, she is still on the House Foreign Affairs Committee?
Just something to remember as the situation in Venezueladeteriorates.”
— Stacey Matthews, Legal Insurrection.

Commentators like to remind people that Omar is critical of Israel, but the way they word it is that she is anti-Semitic. As with Venezuelathere are many people who oppose Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. According to most of the politicians in Congress we are all anti-Semitic. Once again we get a nasty label that is intended to stop us from questioning US foreign policy. While Omar has been under attack from Congress, she has been defended by some members of the mainstream US press. From Vox:

“The reaction to the tense exchange was interestingly divided.
Many observers on the left — including me — celebrated Omar’s interrogation of Abrams as a rare example of a US foreign policy official being held accountable for past sins. Conservatives, on the other hand, lined up to defend Abrams’s record, arguing that he was actually an advocate for human rights and democracy who’s well suited to handle the current crisis in Venezuela.
But this was more than just standard partisan uproar. It was a revelatory incident, one that showed how the insurgent left flank of the Democratic Party is raising questions about premises that the Washington establishment has long taken for granted.
These questions have significance not only for the issue of how America sees its past role on the world stage — as an imperialist power, a beneficent liberator, or something in between — but also for how it behaves in future crises like the one in Venezuela.
It was, in short, one of the most interesting little moments in American foreign policy I’ve seen in quite some time.”

The so called “Squad” is way over due in this country. Conservatives seem almost dumb-founded that anyone elected to office would dare to question US foreign policy. The Squad is bringing up arguments that many of us have made, but we have not been able to question those who hold office.
It is about time for us to finally question some of these policies.


Nicaragua represents the worst of third world politics-that can happen today

$
0
0


By SJ Otto
Events in Nicaragua are troubling to say the least. I have read one newspapers account after another and they all paint a bleak picture of what is happening in Nicaragua. The articles focus mainly on growing authoritarianism by President Daniel Ortega and his wife Rosario Murillo, violent protests against his government and the same kinds of economic problems we see now in Venezuela.
After 1979, there were many leftists as myself who flocked to support the Sandinista Revolution. This was a Marxist government that had a thriving democracy as well as the kinds of public works and programs to fight poverty that we had come to expect from a Marxist revolution. The Sandinista’s seemed to be Marxist as Cuba, but they were far more democratic. This was the kind of Revolution that western Marxists had hoped for the entire 20th century. This seemed to be the most democratic Marxist revolution that every existed. That is excluding elected leaders such as Salvador Allende, who also attempted Democratic Marxism, but relied entirely on the electoral system of Chile. The Sandinistas had an actual revolution, such as Cubaor Mexico.
During this time we had President Ronald Reagan who took power in the US and he made it a priority to try and destroy the very revolution so many of us worked to support. He armed a CIA manufactured guerrilla army and waged open war on the Sandinistas. He instituted a blockade and sabotaged their economy. He had the CIA and other US officials try and manipulate Nicaragua’s elections. He finally had some success in 1990, where Violeta Barrios de Chamorro won the presidential election. It was victory for Reagan and a bitter defeat for US progressives.
For many of us there was always hope that the Sandinistas could come back into power in a later election. That seemed to happen when Ortega came back to power, winning the presidential election in 2007. At the time left-leaning governments were being elected in many Central and South American countries. As with many third-world Marxist parties, such as in Mozambiqueand Angola in Africa, the Sandinistas were now calling themselves democratic socialists rather than Marxists. And still many of us hoped the election of Ortega would return Nicaraguato a left-leaning country once again.
What is happening today in Nicaragua is not positive at all. Suddenly a place that held great promise for American (meaning the hemisphere, not just the US) leftists seems to be fading fast. Ortega is trying to create what looks like a one party state. But this is not a leftist party state as we have seen in Cuba. Ortega has moved to the right on many issues. He has slashed social programs that were the pride of the Sandinista Revolution. He has banned abortion to win favors of Christian right-wing groups. His authoritarian actions, such as banning opposition parties, have led to anti-government protests from both the left and right. His actions may actually be pushing the country’s population away from supporting socialism or Marxism. From, NACLA“Nicaragua’s Authoritarian Turn is Not a Product of Leftist Politics”:

Civil society, which emerged as a vibrant political sphere in the 1990s, has suffered under the Ortega administration. For instance, Ortega has targeted feminist non-governmental organizations, many of them founded by onetime Sandinistas, with policies that monitor and limit their outside funding. These efforts have been accompanied by a vitriolic campaign in FSLN-controlled media, accusing Nicaraguan feminists of money laundering, CIA collusion, pornography, and promoting illegal abortions. Attempts by former Sandinistas to develop opposition parties like the Sandinista Renovation Movement have been met with similar responses. A cursory review of Ortega’s policy positions shows that his administration no longer enacts the values that once defined the Sandinista Revolution. As Sandinista Vice President of Nicaraguafrom 1985 to 1990, Sergio Ramírez, writes in his memoir Adiós Muchachos, the party has been “entirely replaced by the personal will of Daniel himself and his wife, Rosario Murillo.” What we are witnessing today is not the return of Sandinismo but the rise of Orteguismo.


There are reports in the mainstream press of protesters carrying blue and white flags. Right-wing protest movements often use a national color and then mix it with white. Many of these people seem similar to the right-wing protesters of Venezuelaand they are no doubt hoping to push Nicaragua back into the kind of bourgeois government they had before the revolution. The US is, once again, trying to use legitimate protests to re-establish the kind of imperialist control they had in Nicaraguabefore the Sandinista Revolution. By coincidence the US now has a right-wing populist president similar to Roland Reagan. Again from, NACLA:

U.S. occupation and support for the Somoza regime bestowed on Nicaragua a deep and enduring experience of political repression. It is no wonder that FSLN founder Carlos Fonseca identified U.S.imperialism as the driving force behind authoritarianism in the country. Inspired by Sandino’s struggle for national sovereignty in the 1920s, the FSLN emerged in the 1960s as a homegrown response to dictatorship and imperialism. The improbable success of the Sandinista Revolution initiated a period of political transformation, as Nicaraguaattempted to forge a new society, grounded in political pluralism and democratic participation, which served the interests of its most vulnerable sectors. Sandinista state policy reflected these commitments with agrarian reform, expansions in health services, and a national literacy campaign that brought a generation of youth to the countryside to teach rural families to read. The revolution infused new social and democratic energies into political life, and popular participation in revolutionary organizations burgeoned.
The New York Times covered the destabilization campaign extensively, making the editorial board’s claim that “allegations of corruption” led to the Sandinista electoral defeat appear myopic at best.
No single factor explains the 1990 electoral defeat that brought the Sandinista Revolution to a close. Certainly, the fledgling Sandinista state made significant errors as it sought to remake the highly unequal society it inherited from the Somoza regime. The Sandinista’s early approach to governing indigenous and Afro-descendant communities on the Caribbean coast was one of the most serious. But these missteps are overshadowed by the tremendous resources and energy the U.S.dedicated to sabotaging the revolution. As Nicaraguan poet and former Sandinista Gioconda Belli writes in her memoir of the revolutionary years, “I will never cease to be appalled at the utterly venomous, unwarranted manner in which the United States acted toward a tiny country that simply tried to do things its own way, even if this meant making its own mistakes.” A massive propaganda campaign against the revolutionary state paired with diplomatic pressures to isolate the country were followed by $400 million USD in aid to the Contra insurgency, the mining of Nicaraguan harbors, and a debilitating U.S. trade embargo. The New York Times covered the destabilization campaign extensively, making the editorial board’s claim that “allegations of corruption” led to the Sandinista electoral defeat appear myopic at best.

It is not surprising to see that the mainstream press is covering Nicaraguaas it is covering events in Venezuela. They are blaming everything on leftwing politics. For an example see “Op-Ed: Nicaragua’s democracy is falling apart,” Los Angeles Times.
Also from NACLA:

“The recent events in Nicaraguahave garnered attention from mainstream media outlets in the U.S., decades after international press corps flocked to the country to cover the Sandinista Revolution and the Contra War that followed. While Nicaragua has faded from public consciousness, old political narratives about the country and the Latin American Left die hard. Nowhere is this more evident than the recent New York Times editorial, ‘Dynasty,’ The Nicaragua Version.
Authored by the Times editorial board, the piece tells a story that reflects U.S.political interests as well as a good deal of amnesia about our country’s history of intervention in Nicaragua. Focusing on the corruption of the Latin American Left as an explanation for rising authoritarianism, the board laments the democratic deficit that now exists in the country. The analysis, steeped in a heady dose of American exceptionalism, omits U.S.efforts to squelch democratic aspirations in Nicaragua and misses the true tragedy of events: Ortega’s betrayal of the revolutionary Left and the vision of a more just society it represented.”

Also from NACLA, there is this:

What the New York Times editorial board misses is that the corruption and authoritarianism unfolding in Nicaragua is not a failure exclusive to the contemporary FSLN. Ortega’s efforts to establish a family dynasty are distressing, but he is hardly unique. The revival of the strongman role reflects a political tradition of caudillismo in Nicaragua. The Sandinista Revolution offered a short-lived challenge to that tradition. Even with the mistakes made by its leadership, the revolution’s vision of popular democracy and embrace of liberation theology’s preferential option for the poor created a democratic opening in the 1980s that was once unimaginable. U.S.efforts to crush this opening are a shameful product of our interventionist policy in the region.
The editorial board closes by noting dire conditions in Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, which have led citizens of these countries to flee their homes for an uncertain future in the U.S. Nicaragua has been spared the worst of the violence that plagues postwar Central America, but all four countries share a crippling legacy of U.S.intervention. After the Cold War, the focus shifted to counternarcotics, and the U.S.helped to remilitarize the region to fight the drug war. At home, border militarization and the criminalization of immigration has added another layer of violence to our historical entanglement with our neighbors to the south. For the rest of the world, our interference in Latin Americahas had similarly destructive consequences. Historian Greg Grandin writes that the region, as a workshop for U.S.empire, has served as a testing ground for interventionist strategies and counter-insurgency tactics used in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
There is no mistake that we are witnessing an authoritarian turn in Nicaragua. But if we are to understand how and why this happened we cannot ignore the role of U.S.intervention. Rather than chiding the Latin American Left for its corruption or anti-democratic tendencies, we would do well to consider how the U.S.presence in the region has diminished democracy and promoted violence and suffering. Any effort to understand contemporary Central America demands an honest reckoning with this history. And while we too lament the growing authoritarianism of the Sandinista state, a critical reexamination of U.S.policy in Central America is long overdue.

Once again there are problems on both sides. Ortega has set himself up as a dictator and it seems more based on his personal greed and hunger for power and not for the benefit of the poor in Nicaragua. However his opposition is mostly taken over by right-wing forces and shills for US imperialism. We don’t want to endorse this Charlton, but we don’t want to unwittingly end up supporting the efforts of US imperialism. The US government under Trump is trying to overthrow Ortega and the Sandinistas, trying to portray this as freedom vs. socialism. Real socialism is not anti-freedom and that needs to be pointed out by the people of this country. Congress people such as Ilhan Omar have stood up to the tyrant Trump and spoke out against him. We all need to do the same. Many people in this country realize that being socialist is not the same as being anti-freedom.

Machinists Strike at Sherwin-Williams in Andover, Kansas

$
0
0

This last Friday there was a rally in Andover, Kansas, for the strikers at Sherwin Williams. The local Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) here in Wichitais supporting the strike. All of us on the left support strikes and labour efforts. Labor uions are one of the few worker supported institutions that can aid working people in getting treated fairly, here in the US. And in this capitalist country, that brags that it is the freest country in the world, labour uion rights are not respected at all. Conservatives, in the Republican Party, but some in the Democrat Party, have worked hard to break strikes and uions. Unions in the USare in danger of being wiped out. So it is especially important that we support Union workers and their activities, such as strikes. –SJ Otto



For the first time in nearly half a century, more than ninety machinist union members from Local 708 working at Sherwin Williams in Andover, Kansas have made the arduous decision to demand justice on the job for themselves and all workers by going out on strike. The strike started at midnight on Saturday, September 28 after the group voted to reject the company’s final offer.
“It’s the toughest decision a worker makes to go on strike because it directly affects not only themselves but the welfare of their families,” said IAM Southern Territory General Vice President Rickey Wallace. “But our members at Local 708 have decided they have no choice in order to keep these good, union jobs at Sherwin Williams viable for the next generation. These courageous brothers and sisters of the Machinists Union have the full support of the IAMAW as they walk for fairness.”
The main reasons for the strike were the company’s refusal to three-year agreement, safety issues, wage gaps and a staunch attendance policy among other items. Before this, these members proudly manufactured quality marine and industrial protective coatings used worldwide.
“IAM Local Lodge 708 members working for Sherwin Williams have rejected the company’s offer for the right reasons,” said Chief Negotiator and District 70 Business Representative Tyson Kelly. “The company is not maintaining a safe working environment by continuing to ignore hazardous conditions and forcing employees to work with on-the-job injuries. The employees at this Sherwin Williams facility are fighting for fairness and safer workplace.”
For the rest of the story click here.


New revelations about Trump test Pelosi’s narrow impeachment strategy

$
0
0
 It is time to take a look at the Democratic Party's Impeachment strategy. -SJ   Otto 


Since House Democrats launched their impeachment inquiry just over two weeks ago, Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her top lieutenants have coalesced around a plan to focus on Trump’s pressure on the Ukrainian president to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, a 2020 presidential candidate, and his son Hunter. The episode, Democrats argue, is clear-cut, easy for Americans to understand and doesn’t require  further proof as the White House has released a rough transcript of the call.

For the rest click here.

Trump is helping Erdoğan committing genocide and ethnic cleansing

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
I rarely support US troops being in a foreign country and I have supported President Donald Trump any time he has pulled troops out of a country (which is actually very rare). But taking the troops out of Syria, and allowing Turkey to come in and invade the Kurds is one time when I oppose the action. It is one of the most irresponsible actions of Trump’s presidency. Next to destroying poor people’s health care, by destroying Obama Care, Trump has sentenced a lot of Kurds to death.What surprises me the most is how many other conservative people agree with me. From NPR:

“Loyal allies such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blasted Trump's decision and said it "will be the biggest mistake of his presidency" if not reversed.
At least one Republican went a step further with his criticism of Trump.
Illinois Rep. John Shimkus, who is retiring from Congress, called the president's decision to leave Syrian Kurds to fend for themselves "terrible and despicable."
"In fact, I called my chief of staff in D.C. I said pull my name off the 'I support Donald Trump list.' I mean, we have just stabbed our allies in the back," he told local radio station KMOX.”

Again, I almost never agree with Republicans but this issue is a lot different. I’m also surprised at the support this issue gets from Conservative Christian Evangelicals. According to the New York Times:

“Some of the president’s most ardent supporters worry that troop withdrawal threatens religious minorities, especially Christians. They are pushing back, to a point.
One called President Trump’s decision “an egregious act of betrayal.” Another said the policy could be “the biggest mistake of his presidency.” A third said Mr. Trump “is in danger of losing the mandate of heaven.”
Conservative Christians have ardently stood by Mr. Trump at most every turn, from allegations of sexual misconduct to his policy of separating migrant families at the border and the Russiainvestigation.
But this week, some of Mr. Trump’s top evangelical supporters broke rank to raise alarms over his move to withdraw troops from Syria, which prompted Turkish forces to launch a ground and air assault against a Kurdish-led militia that has been a crucial ally in the American fight against ISIS.
As Turkish warplanes began to bomb Syrian towns on Wednesday, the prominent evangelist Franklin Graham called for Mr. Trump to reconsider his decision, and worried that the Kurds — and the Christian minorities in the region they have defended — could be annihilated.”

From what I am hearing on NPR today Trump made a phone call to Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and after that he made the decision to pull all UStroops out of the Kurdish part of Syria. Either Trump knew damn well what Erdoğan planned to do or he is a complete moron.
Either way Trump is a very dangerous man. Even members of his on party have jumped in to warn  him how bad his action has become.
There are several factions of Kurds. Some are Christians. But some are member of the PKK,[1] or The Kurdistan Workers' Party, or in KurdishPartiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎. The latter is a secular organization, which is also a semi-socialist group, with an ideology based on anarchist like ideas of Murray Bookchin. This may be one more of Trump's attacks on socialism. If so it is amazingly murderous. 
Not all the Kurdish guerrillas are members of the PKK. As stated above, many Conservative Christians Evangelicals are concerned about fellow Christians.  
For those of us on the left, we are concerned about the PKK, which unlike most of the other Kurdish groups as well as other Arab groups, the PKK is a sectarian organization. They are not really Marxists anymore, but they are probably one of the most left leaning groups in the Middle East, or other parts of the world for that matter.
Erdoğan is one of the most murderous leaders since Adolf Hitler. While conservatives are making accusations that anyone who supports President Nicolás Maduro, of Venezuela as being un-American because he is a socialist dictator, Erdoğan has stripped their congress of power and set himself up as a dictator. And yet Conservatives have said nothing about or against him. Now he is committing ethnic genocide. Only now have conservatives come out against what Trump and Erdoğan are doing.
This is not just bad policy it is ethnic cleansing and genocide and Trump is playing a big part in this.



[1]From Wikipedia,The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (KurdishPartiya Karkerên Kurdistanê) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey. For more, click on Wikipedia.

The Strike at Sherwin Williams continues

$
0
0

The Strike at Sherwin Williams continues


Hong Kong protesters are foolish cowards

$
0
0
By SJ Otto
Protests have never been unusual around the world. But what surprises me is the fact that people protesting their governments have called on the US to intervene in their countries internal affairs. That has happenedin Venezuela, here I have seen people on the TV, who are protesting against President Nicolás Maduro, and they have asked the US to invade their country and remove an elected president.
No I see protesters in Hong Kong carrying American flags and asking the US to protect them from their own police. It is outright embarrassing. We seem to  be living in a time when violent protests take place by conservative people act cowardly, expecting “Big Daddy US” to magically come in and save them. These people don’t seem to realize that the US rarely acts on behalf of people in foreign countries. The US, whether troops or sanctions, goes where our so called “interest” lie. US leaders, as Trump, like to talk about supporting democracy and freedom, but what they really support is just their right to make money and they make that money at the expense of other people, in other countries. They take care of US interests and they rarely protect anyone else.
In a major act of hypocrisy, both Democrats and Republicans are pushing through congress a so called “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act.” According to    
South China Morning Post, while cover the massive protests:

A spokesman for the organiser said: “Our rally is to urge US congressmen to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act. We also want to show them our stance on freedom.

And US politicians, almost unanimously have passed such a law. According to the BBC:

The bill - which still needs to pass the upper house, the Senate - would mandate an annual review, to see whether Hong Kong had sufficient autonomy from the rest of Chinato justify its special trading status.
The lower chamber also approved stopping tear gas exports to Hong Kong.
On Monday, Hong Kong protesters took to the streets to support the USbill.

The real hypocrisy here is that the USwould NEVER support that kind of protesting here in the US—vandalism and throwing fire bombs at police? No way! All we have to do is look at how protester were treated during the Occupy Movement. They were not violent and yet there was tear gas and mass arrests used to break up a non-violent protest movement here in this country.
For people here at this blog, we are well aware that this country will not do anything to support real democracy. The Hong Kong protesters are naive idiots and cowards. If they really want democracy and freedom, they need to do it on their own and not try and rely on a foreign imperialist power. Unfortunately we live in a time when cowards are rewarded for their deplorable actions.


Wichita Chapter of DSA met last night.

$
0
0


By SJ Otto
It is a good idea for political activist to meet and socialize even if the meeting is mostly for socializing. So members of the Wichita Chapter of DemocraticSocialists of America met at Picasso’s Pizzeria, in west Wichita, last night (Thursday).
Although it was an in formal meeting with no real agenda, we had a lively discussion about the upcoming presidential elections and the impeachment of President Donald Trump. we had about five new people who came to discuss democratic socialism and learn more about the group. There are always new people who want to know some basics about socialism in general. Two people discussed the need for managers in factories. There were two people there who said they work at the airplane factories and disused the need for managers over the factory workers. One of our more experienced members explained that working people all have different skills and some working people make good managers.
Some members said they would only support Bernie Sanders for Presidential candidate to try and beat Trump. Some members said they might support Elisabeth warren. Others said they did not trust her to stand up to conservatives who would expect to be able to bully her around.
Wichita DSA has a formal monthly meeting planned for October 27. I will be there and I will report on it.

PKK letter to the American people and President Trump

$
0
0
Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) Foreign Relations Committee wrote a letter addressing to the American people and President Donald J. Trump responding to the comparisons made between the Kurdish movement and ISIS amid the genocidal campaign of the Turkish state against the Kurdish people.
The letter reads as follows;
“To the American people and President Donald J. Trump,
We refuse comparisons being made between our movement and the inhumane thugs of ISIS. Our response is as follows: There are more than 40 million Kurds living in the Middle East today. At the end of the First World War, outside powers divided them among four autocratic states: Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey, where our movement began. 
For years, the Kurdish people had asked these governments only for the basic democratic rights that you enjoy each day: the right to exist, to speak their own language, to practice their own culture, to participate in politics as free and equal citizens.
"PKK WAS FOUNDED TO RESIST THE TURKISH STATE VIOLENCE"
Each time, they were brutally subjugated: bombed with advanced weapons, torn from their homes in the middle of the night and disappeared, jailed and tortured, their villages flattened, and their very language and culture banned. Up until we founded the PKK in 1978 to resist the violence of the Turkish state against the Kurdish people, it had already massacred hundreds of thousands of Kurds in the Kurdish regions of Turkey. We don’t have to go too far back in time, in the 90s the Turkish state destroyed 4,000 Kurdish villages and extra-judicially killed 17,000 Kurds.
“OUR EFFORTS WERE IGNORED”
Turkish leaders believed, like so many tyrants throughout history, that they could crush the basic human desire for a free life with violence and terror. They branded us as terrorists and criminals and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get other countries like the United States of America to do so too, even as their forces committed unspeakable atrocities in violation of all principles of international law. We signed the Geneva Conventions and asked for peace negotiations on various occasions since 1993, knowing that the war could end the second Kurdish rights were institutionalized. These efforts were ignored.
“PKK HAS NEVER TARGETED THE U.S. OR ANY COUNTRY”
The PKK has never targeted the U.S. or any other country. We have never shied away from the negotiating table to solve this conflict peacefully and politically. As a matter of fact, we have declared no less than eight ceasefires since 1993 to pave the way for negotiations. The PKK’s political project is founded on basic human rights and liberties, gender liberation, religious pluralism and ecological rights.
When ISIS began its campaign of terror across Syria and Iraq, we knew we had to respond. The group threatened not only the ideals we have fought so many years to defend, but the safety of tens of millions of people. The well-armed and well-funded states of the region and the world were slow to respond, weighing the cost of action as millions fell under extremist subjugation.
In August of 2014, we carried out a humanitarian campaign in Sinjar, Iraq, where ISIS was committing atrocities against the Yezidi community that the United Nations would subsequently recognize as a genocide. The Yezidis had been left defenseless by the world, facing an enemy who regional forces had so far been unable to stop. Our first military unit dispatched to the region was made up of just seven people. From those beginnings, we were able to open a humanitarian corridor to Northeast Syria, allowing 35,000 civilians besieged on Mount Sinjar to reach safety. We went on to join other forces in liberating the region from ISIS control.
“TURKEY DID NOTHING TO STOP ISIS EXTREMISTS”
As our movement and our people gave thousands of lives in this fight, the Turkish state that calls us ‘terrorists’ did nothing to stop the ISIS extremists that were terrorizing innocent civilians across the world. The Turkish state has attacked Northeast Syria with greater ferocity today than they ever did when ISIS plotted international attacks from territory just across their border. They have sent terrorist gangs affiliated with al-Qaeda to torture and murder the people who defeated ISIS. They see the simple articulation of Kurdish identity as a greater threat than the groups that targeted innocents in not only Sinjar and Kobani, but Paris, Manchester, and New York City.
Many Americans saw in May 2017 how the Turkish President Erdogan ordered his bodyguards to brutally attack peaceful Kurdish protestors in your capital city; imagine what they do in Kurdistan. We are not guilty of terrorism; we are victims of state terrorism. But we are guilty of defending our people. We believe that the American people will be able to judge for themselves who the dangerous terrorists of this world are.”


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorses Jessica Cisneros for Congress

$
0
0


I just received this letter from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Conservative politicians and pundits have been unrelenting in their attempts to embarrass her and destroy her career. Fox News constantly tries to portray her as ignorant and dumb. Their attempts have failed. Rather than destroy her, the constant attention to her has given her lots of publicity and they have catapulted her to being a house hold name. She has become a dominating figure in Congress. She is smart and able to defend herself when she is attacked. I hope AOC not only wins re-election, but I hope more people as her, progressive and left wing, win elections and move in on our stodgy conservative congress.
-SJ Otto
So from AOC:

When I first announced my campaign for Congress, people told me it wasn’t possible for someone like me to run and win. They said we couldn’t raise enough money or earn the endorsements needed to unseat a powerful incumbent.
We proved them wrong. We showed that the grassroots could beat the big money and establishment insiders. This year, I became the youngest woman to serve in Congress — and I want another young progressive woman to shatter that record in 2020.
That’s why I’m proud to endorse Jessica Cisneros for Congress. She’s a progressive fighter running up against an entrenched incumbent. She can’t win this race on her own — but with the people behind her, she’ll be unstoppable. That’s why I’m asking you to help her right now:
Jessica was born and raised in the border town of Laredo. The daughter of immigrant farmworkers, she grew up watching her parents work hard but still struggle to get by. While her parents fought to keep their small business afloat, she saw firsthand how many of the laws written in D.C. weren’t written to protect people like her. And she noticed that the people elected to represent her were more accountable to corporate donors than to the members of her community.
Just like us in 2018, Jessica is running against a powerful incumbent as an unapologetic advocate for her community. Her opponent, Henry Cuellar, has more than $3,000,000 in his campaign bank account, and these funds aren’t coming from the grassroots. They’re coming from corporate PACs, Big Oil, and private prison corporations like GEO Group.
She needs our help to compete on an even playing field. Can I count on you to chip in today?
I need your help to bring Jessica to Congress so we can fight together for a Green New Deal, Medicare for All and fixing our broken immigration system. Together we can shift the center of gravity in Congress away from the privileged, powerful few and towards the many.
Pa'lante,
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

US has revived the cold war in Latin America—Chile and Ecuador have left-wing protests

$
0
0


By SJ Otto
Lately the UShas been very supportive of people protesting their governments. After all protesters are fighting for democracy in such countries Hong Kong and Venezuela. Our governing leaders have all given full support to these protesters. They have vilified the governments they are protesting.
US meddling have had the backing of millions of conservative people all across the US. After weeks of hearing about theses protests from the media—it appears as if no one in the USwould dare to oppose the protesters in these countries.
After almost a year of protests in Venezuela, in which the UShas backed an opposition protest leader Juan Guaidó as that country’s president, it would seem as if left-wing governments are the only place where such protests have taken place.
Now after all this time, it seems that right-wing government are now under attack by protesters. Currently in Chile, the government of billionaire Sebastian Piñera has deployed the army to crush nationwide demonstrations against inequality sparked by a subway fare hike.
In Ecuador, indigenous peoples, workers and students recently brought the country to a standstill during 11 days of protests against the gutting of fuel subsidies by President Lenín Moreno as part of an IMF austerity package.
Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro and the old-guard left around the world are celebrating Chile’s violent street protests as evidence of the alleged failure of free-market capitalism.
And is there any news coverage of Ecuadoror Chile? So far I have heard nothing by the mainstream press. It is as if these protests never happened.
But there are some news outlets that have been paying attention to the way our mainstream press have treated those who protest right-wing governments. According to a news outlet called Fair:

Throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, people are rising up against right-wing, US-backed governments and their neoliberal austerity policies.
Currently in Chile, the government of billionaire Sebastian Piñera has deployed the army to crush nationwide demonstrations against inequality sparked by a subway fare hike.
In Ecuador, indigenous peoples, workers and students recently brought the country to a standstill during 11 days of protests against the gutting of fuel subsidies by President Lenín Moreno as part of an IMF austerity package.
One might expect these popular rebellions to receive unreservedly sympathetic coverage from international media that claim to be on the side of democracy and the common people. On the contrary, corporate journalists frequently describe these uprisings as dangerous alterations of “law and order,” laden with “violence,” “chaos” and “unrest.”
This portrait contrasts remarkably with coverage of anti-government protests in Venezuela, where generally the only violence highlighted is that allegedly perpetrated by the state. In the eyes of Western elite opinion, Venezuela’s middle-class opposition have long been leaders of a legitimate popular protest against an authoritarian, anti-American regime. Poor people rebelling against repressive USclient states are considered an unacceptable deviation from this script.
‘Crackdown’ in Venezuela
Corporate journalists have never been able to contain their enthusiasm for the right-wing Venezuelan opposition’s repeated coup attempts, which are regularly cast as a “pro-democracy” movement (FAIR.org5/10/19).
In 2017, Venezuela’s opposition led four months of violent, insurrectionary protests demanding early presidential elections, resulting in over 125 dead, including protesters, government supporters and bystanders. It was the opposition’s fifth major effort to oust the government by force since 2002.
For the rest of this article click here.

Latin America today is like a replay of the old Cold War. On the side of the left are Cuba, Venezuela, Boliviaand Nicaragua. Most of the other countries have had right wing government voted in over the last 10 years and they are all lackeys of the US. The CIA and other American institution worked hard to get left-wing government voted out in such countries as Ecuador. Changes in that country allowed the US to get Julian Assange turned over to them. That is because they got the people of that country to vote in Lenín Moreno, who replaced President Rafael Correa.Correa was not able to run having served two terms and that is all that government allowed him. Correa was a left leaning politician who refused to send Assange back the US. Morenois the kind of leader the USwanted in Ecuador. As with the governments in Colombiaand Chile, they are the perfect puppets of the US. They are obedient lackeys of USimperialism.
AlreadyBolivia’s President Evo Morales gave a press conference, recently, in which he warned that a right-wing coup attempt is being carried out so as to stop the full counting of votes, and annul the result of a recent presidential election, which gave Morales a first-round victory.
Considering the type of meddling the US has conducted in Venezuela, it is not a stretch of the imagination to believe the US is trying to overthrow Morales’ government. He is following the same kind of socialist policies as Maduro. Unlike Maduro he is very popular and his economy has been very successful. Considering the kind of anti-socialist meddling we have see from President Donald trump, it is likely we will see the same kind of absurd accusation against Morales as we have seen in Venezuela.
Trump and his ilk are working hard to eradicate socialism from Latin America. Trump has admitted that. It is unlikely to work in all of those countries. We have seen how ruthless and barbaric Trump is. He may have pulled US troops out of Syriato allow the Turkish government to destroy the PKK. Trump has admitted he thinks the PKK is worse than ISIS (the Islamic State). 
So while much of the rest of the world has seen stodgy right-wing oriented governments pushing out any kind of left leaning governments, the left is still alive and well in Latin America. As leftist here in the USwe need to keep supporting left leaning governments, such as Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Bolivia, as well as supporting anti-right-wing protesters in Ecuador and Chile. Not all these governments are saints. The government of Daniel Ortega, in Nicaragua, may lack legitimacy. But we need to keep the US from interfering in that country. We need to support socialism and oppose US interference.


The end of the Sherwin Williams Machinist Union strike- as explained by DSA

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
The strike against Sherwin Williams, by Machinist Union members from Local 708, in Andover, is over now. The employees have already gone back to work. They got a 10 percent increase in pay. They got an increase in their health insurance. But at the monthly Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) meeting, it was explained to us that the strike was actually an unfair labor practice dispute rather than an economic strike.
The main reason for the strike was a need for safety representatives. They did get some economic gains from the strike, but the main reason for it was actually for safety problems.  There was no place for the average worker to lodge a complaint.
Some other details of the strike are that the workers can now shower before they leave and on company time. Before the strike workers had to drive home with paint and dangerous chemicals all over them.
We all discussed the importance of not crossing the picket line during a strike. At times there are sympathy strikes by other unions, on such things as trucking. Even the guy who came in to cut the grass is encouraged not to cross over the picket line. The trucks that bring lunches in to the workers could also refuse to cross the picket line.
In earlier times unions could be pretty vigilant against those who cross the picket line. I can remember a strike I too part in, People who crossed the picket line often got their car or vehicle vandalized. I knew a young woman who drove her car to a cab company and took the cab to work, across the picket line. When she got back that night, all her tires were slashed.
There was this gung-ho redneck who was a foreman in the plant. He proudly drove over the picket line every day. One day vandals threw grease all over the inside of his truck. All the inside seats, all the steering equipment and the entire inside was drenched in oil. His truck was badly damaged.
Speakers from DSA said the unions no longer do those things any more. For me personally, I miss those days. When someone offended us there was retribution. I don’t regret those earlier times. But some times I just have to go along with the groups as they have canged. I can reminisce, but I have to go along with the times.
It was announced that we may see some strikes around January. We don’t know that for sure, but some union people have leaked that some union members may be vulnerable to loosing their yearly bonuses. Those are a significant loss.
The idea of turning over conservative laws, that have been passed over the last 30
years ago, to weaken unions was brought up at the meeting. The Taft Hardy Act was discussed. The answer to that is that there are no easy answers to changing union Laws.
We all discussed a book many of us will be reading and discussing called Joyful Militancy, Building Thriving Resistance to Toxic Times, by Carla Bergman, Nick Montgomeryand Hari Alluri.
The book looks at the concepts of Happiness under capitalism and the concept of Joy. We read from an excerpt called Happiness is bullshit. A lot of it reminded me of the writings I’ve done on advertising.

It was reported that a meeting for those interested in prison pen pals, an event organized by a Kansas City DSA chapter was broken up by members of a Maoist group from Kansas City, MO. DSA activist offered to let the Maoists address the crowed, but they refused to speak to the group. They were destructive and they attacked the people in attendance. They threw DSA pamphlets all around the floor and just disrupted the meeting in generals. They physically beat up an old veteran speaker who was invited to the meeting. 


It’s another Halloween and Samhain

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
I like celebrating our traditional holidays if they have historical significance. Many of our holidays, Christmas, Easter and Halloween, have been celebrated as Christian holidays. But they were also celebrated before Christianity when pre-Christian religions where practiced all across Europe. Halloween used to be called Samhain, by Druids and the Wicca religions. On this Samhain(this hyperlink goes to Circle Sanctuary, for a really good look at this holiday and its history) day of celebration it was both a holiday to celebrate the end of the harvest season and it was also a time when people believed spirits could come back to Earth. To prevent being harassed by evil spirits people put out jack-o'-lanterns and dressed in scary outfits with scary masks to scare away the demonic spirits. Pumpkins were not known to the old world back then, so turnips and other vegetables were carved instead.

Here are a few songs to go along with this Holiday:

Bauhaus - Bela Lugosi's Dead (Original)

This is Halloween - The Nightmare before Christmas


Ramones - Pet Sematary



Add your name to join Feeding America and tell USDA not to cut food assistance for working families!

$
0
0


The Trump Administration is at it again. A just-released administrative action would cut BILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by taking away a state’s ability to determine how much heating and cooling assistance impacts your food assistance.

This is the THIRD administrative action in the last year aimed at cutting food assistance from people who need it — including seniors, people with disabilities, working families, and children.

These disastrous plans cannot go forward unchecked. That’s why we need your help today. The Trump Administration must read and record every unique message they get on this plan.

Take one minute now to add your name to oppose it.


ADD YOUR NAME

It’s hard to fathom why anyone would take away much-needed food benefits from millions of families. But the Trump Administration’s latest rule goes even farther — cutting SNAP benefits by taking away a state’s ability to determine how heating and cooling bills are accounted for when determining SNAP eligibility. This move would force families facing hunger to make a choice: put food on the table OR pay to heat your home. Not both.

If this proposed rule is allowed to take effect, it would take 568 MILLION meals every year off the tables of families who rely on SNAP food assistance to afford groceries. Just how many meals are on the line? Enough to feed the entire population of Los Angeles — 142 times over.

Those are meals that help kids learn and thrive in the classroom. Meals that take care of seniors who have served their communities for years. Meals that help people from all walks of life get back on their feet. And without these meals, families may go hungry.

The best way for you to fight back is to provide a comment about why you oppose this hurtful change. Every comment will be read and considered, so we need as many people as possible to speak up today.

Please, add your name right now while you're thinking about it.

Thao Nguyen
Managing Director of Advocacy
Feeding America

I'll be getting Medicare next year and it is like every thing our government does—some one has to profit from the sick and dying

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
I turn 65 next January. That is when I can start to benefit from Medicare. Until recently I thought that Medicare just pays for our medical bills when we get old enough to receive it. That’s not what it is at all. Instead it is a convoluted system of insurance companies that we have to choose from. We pay for the insurance, and it isn’t that cheap. I already knew that it only pays for 80 percent of our medical needs. We pay an insurance company for this privilege. Now I have to make all kinds of decisions as to what company I will use? With who will I make plans with? And—what kind of plan will I need?
What bothers me the most is that all of this is made difficult to choose from and confusing, because here in the USA our system is dedicated to the idea that someone must profit from those who are sick, old and dying. When I went to Cuba this last summer, I realized people there don’t have to pay for their medical needs. And that goes for all people, poor, wealthy, young or old. They also aren’t bothered by commercials on their TV.[1]
Here in the US we are clobbered with commercials. I find them obnoxious, annoying and most of the crap they show us and most of the crap they tell us is deceptive. I mention commercials because I see one after the other, on TV, telling me that it is time to register for Medicare, for those who are eligible (mostly people over 65), and I need to register with these various companies. They are all trying to get me to call their number and use their company to find a medical plan. All of these commercials have testimonials by old people telling us they have a plan/ company/ program that cost them either nothing or close to nothing. ”You have to find a plan that fits you!” all these ads keep telling me. If there is a catch to all the free stuff they advertize there are not telling us what it is. And once again, all of this is so people can profit off of our suffering.
I’m trying to imagine who or which plan is best for me. Are there plans where people pay a lot of money for the things they need?—in other words there plans in which we get over charged and we have to avoid accidently choosing those plans? It is a lot like the folks who brag that their computer and equipment are “user friendly.” And I have to wonder if there are sales people out there who are offering us “user hostile computers”—if we really want them. But then who chooses the hostile computers? Who chooses an expensive plan that pays for very little?
As difficult and confusing this process is, I’m surprised anyone chooses a Medicare plan. But they do—apparently all old people eventually choose a Medicare plan. This is what I must do now. I am confused and I get plenty of headaches trying to understand all of this non-sense. Maybe some day our politicians will build up the courage to ditch all the insurance companies and provide us with Medicare for all. If that happens we will have a system as generous as the system they have in Cuba. On that Island, where they supposedly have “no human rights,” they have the right to get medical care when they are sick—regardless to their age or income. 



[1] For example see:
and:

Commercials—a form of deception and why I hate them

$
0
0

By SJ Otto

If there is one thing I hate about capitalism it is commercials. I have always hated commercials and I hate them more now than ever. Many of them are stupid and annoying. But they are all deceptive.
I have a degree in journalism and that included taking classes on marketing. The idea behind marketing, as well as commercial, is to create a desire for a product or service. There are all kids of commercials. Most sell us on buying products—everything from cold cereal to beer or to cars. Commercials usually have a certain set up for their pitch. They have actors trying to pretend they are everyday people. This is what in propaganda terms is the “just plain folks” approach. The actors are picked to try and look like the average person—an ordinary guy who looks like he could be living right next door to the person they are trying to reach.
At times they give testimonials as if they are just a regular person, telling the target audience about a product and how they just can’t live without it. It’s "the best thing they ever tried." Many times we hear “Wow! That’s delicious!” or “Wow! That’s really good.” And they look sincere. Kids are popular. They have been a favorite of ad persons for many decades. They try to look “cute” to the average viewer and they want you to identify with them. They want the people in their adds to look “just like you” or someone the intended audience persons know.
There are a lot of phrases important to advertising, such as “this will save  you money.” I once heard a person taking about consumerism say that no one ever saved money by spending it. Then there is “call now.” They don’t want the audience to think about if for a while, they want their victims to call right away. To be a good consumer is to buy on impulse which is what advertisers are trying to promote. The advertisers want to promote a consumer economy at all times. People need to buy and consume.
It doesn’t surprise anyone when they find that they have been lied to by an ad. At times advertisers try to lie about what their product is supposed to do. Most of the time advertisers lie to us in ways that are much less obvious. Some time ago two old men were on TV advertising Bartles and Jaymes Wine Coolers. They acted like they owned the company and made the stuff themselves. “Thank you for your support,” They said at the end of the ad. They were down home and folksy. But their wine coolers were actually mass produced by Gallo and those to old men were just actors who had nothing to do making those drinks.
Other examples of false advertising include:

"Kellogg said Rice Krispies could boost your immune system.
Kellogg's popular Rice Krispies cereal had a crisis in 2010 when the brand was accused of misleading consumers about the product's immunity-boosting properties, according to CNN.
The Federal Trade Commission ordered Kellogg to halt all advertising that claimed that the cereal improved a child's immunity with "25 percent Daily Value of Antioxidants and Nutrients — Vitamins A, B, C and E," stating the claims were "dubious."........

 

Later, Kellogg said Mini-Wheats could make you smarter.

In 2013, Kellogg was in even more trouble. The company agreed to pay $4 million for false advertising claims it made about Frosted Mini-Wheats. The cereal company had falsely claimed that the Mini-Wheats improved "children's attentiveness, memory and other cognitive functions," according to Associated Press. The ad campaign claimed that the breakfast cereal could improve a child's focus by nearly 20%.
In its defense, Kellogg said that the ad campaign ran four years previously and that it had since adjusted its claims about the cereal. Kellogg also noted that it "has a long history of responsible advertising."
People who consumed the cereal during the time the ad ran (January 28, 2009 to October 1, 2009) were allowed to claim back $5 per box, with a maximum of $15 per customer, according to Associated Press...........

 

New Balance said its shoe could help wearers burn calories.

New Balance was accused of false advertising in 2011 over a sneaker range that it claimed could help wearers burn calories, according to Reuters. Studies found that there were no health benefits from wearing the shoe.
The toning sneaker claimed to use hidden board technology and was advertised as calorie burners that activated the glutes, quads, hamstrings and calves. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit claimed to have been harmed and misled by the sneaker company........

Lumos Labs said Luminosity could help prevent Dementia.

In January 2016, the makers of popular brain-training app Luminosity were given a $2 million fine from the Federal Trade Commission, which said the company deceived players with "unfounded" advertising claims.
The app company made false claims about being able to help prevent Alzheimer's disease, as well as aiding players to perform better at school, the FTC found. Luminosity said in its ads that people who played the games for more than 10 minutes, three times a week would release their "full potential in every aspect of life,” according to Time."

There are a lot of ways that advertising is deceitful. Quite often the actors we see are just actors and nothing else. They may be posed to look like they are more than that. The reader often encouraged to buy right away as if the product will be sold out or gone. "We're overstocked" is often said to encourage a person to believe that right now is the time to buy the product and "save money." The consumer is always encourage to "buy now." Quit often it really doesn't matter if a product is bought right now or some time later. Often the price is going to be the same.
When it comes to food and drinks it is easy to show a person or group of people consuming the product. A close up shot of just cooked meat or the fizz from a freshly opened soda is all the advertiser needs to entice people to buy their product.
Advertisers like to use popular music. One thing that really bothers me is that it is harder for musicians to make money off their songs. People don't buy as much recorded music as they used to, so many musicians and groups are forced to sell their songs for advertisers to use. I once saw a car company in Spain use the John Lennon song God to sell cars. That is a very serious song and seeing used to hawk cars seemed sacrilegious. It is definitely trivializing a person's work. People have complained about his image and music being used to hawk cars and there should be outrage. Some thing are too important to use for commercials.  
In marketing I was taught to create a need where there is none. A lot of products that people are just unnecessary. For example people stand in long lines to get the next cell phone. Often there is little real difference between the new phone and the old. But advertiser create the need—as with fashions, it is less about what you really need and looking "hip- with it, staying up with the times." There used to be an expression "Keeping up with the Joneses."  It is all about status and look. It's not about needs. That is what I most hate in advertising.
Advertising is in our face. The ads are obnoxious and we can't hardly avoid the. They are everywhere, not just on TV, radio, news papers, magazines and cable. They are on busses, buss benches, on walls, there are big ads on bill boards as we drive down the road. They are on clothes we buy and glasses we drink out of. It seems like every year advertisers find more ways to get their products in our faces.
Advertisers have created for us a consumer society where we take advertizing and other consumer oriented techniques for granted. As the electric poles that carry electricity to our homes become almost invisible to us, so are the ads we are bombarded with.  
Many people say the just ignore ads so they aren't really affected by them. That just isn't the case  

Art Markman Ph.D., writing in Psychology Today, in an article: What Does Advertising Do?, explains that advertising works beyond just telling us about a project. In his article:

"The reason that we accept all this advertising is that we assume that we can tune most of it out. If we don't pay attention to the ads, then they won't have that much of an affect on our behavior. Sure, the makers of commercials can try to jack up the volume, but at least we have the right to look away.
Right?.....
However, ads also do other things. One thing they do is to take a product and to put it next to lots of other things that we already feel positively about. For example, an ad for detergent may have fresh flowers, cute babies, and sunshine in it. All of these things are ones that we probably feel pretty good about already. And repeatedly showing the detergent along with other things that we feel good about can make us feel good about the detergent, too. This transfer of our feelings from one set of items to another is called affective conditioning (the word affect means feelings)."
He then goes on to a cite a study that explains his point.
There are countries without commercials on their TV. I wasin Cuba last summer and I they don't have them. Without capitalism there is no need for advertising. And they are better off without it. We are also better off if we get rid of the capitalist system that has spawned all of this advertising.


This is one of my favorite commercial spoofs:

UHF Movie CLIP - Spatula City Commercial (1989)

WalkAway movement the latest in attempts to discourage Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her supporters

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
Conservatives have had their sites set on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, of New York, ever sense she got elected. They have held nothing back. Lately they have tried a variation of the old “just plain folks” and the “bandwagon effect.” Anna Paulina, Drew Hernandez, Gabriel E. Montalvo, among others, are members of the WalkAway political movement. They have organized a panel discussion and the whole idea is to convince Hispanics in her district to “walk away from the Democrats.
According to Daily Wire:

“For the uninitiated, the #WalkAway movement was created by former progressive Brandon Straka. On May 26, 2018, Straka released a video titled, “Why I Left The Democratic Party.” It has since been viewed more than 2.7 million times on Facebook.

Paulina, who is the Chairwoman of Hispanic Initiatives for Prager U, as well as a congressional candidate in Florida’s 13th district, told me that while Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has been “branded by the mainstream media as the voice of Americans of Hispanic descent,” that’s simply untrue.
She stated that the Hispanic community at large holds conservative values, and that the only reason the Democratic Party focused on them in 2016 was “not because they care about immigration or us as a people, but because we are the largest voting minority in the country – which to them translates to power.”
According to Paulina, the Hispanic town hall is important because it will “showcase some of the largest conservative Hispanics voices in the country who will fight for our constitution and against socialism.”

There are some conservative strains of Hispanic voters. The conservatives can exploit them. As we move closer to next year’s election, we can expect to see all kinds of ridiculous schemes to try and encourage those who are somewhat more conservative than AOC to abandon the Democratic Party and help the right-wing jerks to try and destroy AOC. All across the country we need financially donate to her re-election campaign. Don’t allow conservative dullards to unseat here.


Veteran's Day—A celebration of arrogance—Which I continue to oppose, year after year

$
0
0

By SJ Otto
Every year I run an article to commemorate various holidays—some traditional, as Halloween or Christmas. Not being a Christian I don’t celebrate Christmas, but instead I celebrate the Winter Solstice. There are some holidays, Thanksgiving comes to mind, where the tradition involves controversial events or beliefs.
Tomorrow is Veterans Day and it is probably my least favorite holiday in the US. All across the nation, and on my TV, people will honor the brave men and women who fight wars to keep America the dominant world power. It is a system of imperialism. It is built on arrogance, violence and war. Not long ago I heard singer Patti Smith say something to the effect, that it is ridiculous that we still have the institution of war in the 21 century. One person after the other will claim that “freedom isn’t free.” But I for one do not feel free, due to this country occupying other people’s nation.
One thing that is different this year, an I’m proud to point out that in Congress we have Rep. Ilhan Omar,  Minnesota's 5th congressional district. She is the first congress person in at least 30 years to actually question our nations imperialist actions.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! I’m Amy Goodman, as we turn now to Congress member Ilhan Omar, a Minnesotacongress member. She is the first Somali American elected to Congress, the House of Representatives, one of the first Muslim women in Congress. In February, Ilhan Omar questioned U.S.special envoy to Venezuela Elliott Abrams on Capitol Hill.

We welcome you to Democracy Now! Congress member Ilhan Omar, before we talk about the remarkable rally held for you, in defense of you, yesterday, just outside the Capitol next to the Reflecting Pool, if you can comment what’s taking place right now in Venezuela, the U.S.-supported coup attempt against President Maduro?

REP. ILHAN OMAR: Thank you, Amy, for having me. It’s really great to join you all this morning.

I concur with what Professor Sachs was saying. You know, I mean, a lot of the policies that we have put in place has kind of helped lead the devastation in Venezuela. And we’ve sort of set the stage for where we’re arriving today. This particular bullying and the use of sanctions to eventually intervene and make regime change really does not help the people of countries like Venezuela, and it certainly does not help and is not in the interest of the United States. And I think, finally, we have folks in Congress that see what Professor Sachs was referencing."

This country still occupies Ira and Afghanistan. We do not need to occupy anyone. I’m proud that after all of these years, we finally have ONE person in Congress that has stood against imperialism. I finally have one thing to celebrate this year.
This year and every year I oppose imperialism. I have nothing against our vets, they did what they believed was right. The wars they have fought were immoral and always will be.
If you love cheap gas and cheap resources, at other people's expensesthank a vet.
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live