Quantcast
Channel: The Idiot Factor: Corruption Folly
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live

Orman campaign shows support for independent candidates

$
0
0


Most independent candidates don’t have a snowballs chance of winning elections. But Greg Orman has money to spend on advertizing and that has made his campaign a game changer. The entire nation has noticed his campaign and if he wins it may stop or slow down the Republican’s push to take over the US Senate after this fall’s elections.
Republicans want to paint Orman as a Democrat hiding as an independent, but from his ads he may really be tired of the two parties. For many of us that make him a real attractive candidate. I am tired of the two-party shell game and tired of the ridiculous monopoly they have on the whole two-party system. In fact I strongly oppose the idea of a two party system. It is like declaring that a vehicle, no matter what kind, can only have four wheels.
A recent Gallup poll shows that 
58 percent of the American people are tired of just having two choices and they want a third choice. They feel the two parties we have are doing a terrible job. I agree completely with them. Not only do I feel we have a right to some real choices I think the Democratic Party which I used to support, years ago, no longer represents the people it has claimed to for years. It has tried to move to the right as the Republicans have lunged to the right and there is no longer any American left in today’s political spectrum.
I have no illusions that Orman will reopen the US left. I’m sure he plans to try and stay in the political center as most independent candidates have done. But as with Jesse Ventura, former Governor of Minnesota, and US Senator from Vermont, 
Bernie Sanders, this is one more opportunity to jettison the outdated, stale and just plain undemocratic two party system.
As for the established parties, Kansas Democrats are fighting the court system to not run a candidate in that senate race, for hopes that Orman will stop the Republicans from taking the senate. The Republicans, with their candidate Pat Roberts, 
have brought out the big guns, a parade of nationally known Republicans, such as Texas Governor Rick Perry, Sarah Palin and endorsements from former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Polls are showing that Orman might actually win, with the race being too close to call.


Brownback gets endorsements ... from famous assholes

$
0
0
From F5 (Wichita)

After alarming polls drove home the fact that Governor Sam Brownback is in severe danger of losing his office to Rep. Paul Davis* in the coming election, the Brownback campaign picked up some big endorsements this week. Irrelevant political dancing monkeys, such as failed reality-show star Sarah Palin, traveled to Kansas and offered condescendingly faux-homespun folksiness in hopes of throwing a lifeline to the drowning incumbent. Inspired by Palin's endorsement, several other public figures who have nothing to do with Kansas have come forward in support of Governor Samhain Azmodeus Brownback.
Famous-for-some-reason domestic abuser Chris Brown took a break from his tour to stump for Brownback in Cheney, saying, "A vote for Sam is a vote for good, old fashioned common sense. I'm confident he can beat Davis, just as I have beaten so many."
O.J. Simpson also offered his opinion on the race, releasing a statement from his cell in Nevada's Lovelock Correctional Center. "Sam Brownback is a good man, a powerful leader who can take that budget deficit he created and strangle it, stab it, simply murder it until it is dead," inmate No. 1027820 wrote. "I wholeheartedly endorse his candidacy; a vote for him is surely a vote for my innocence, as well."
North Korean Glorious Leader Kim Jong Un stopped to speak with the press in Topeka on the lawn outside the governor's mansion after his weekly tea, stating that "Voting is a silly construct. It offers nothing but foolish hope to naive peasants. That said, if you are going to allow them to vote, they must vote for their glorious leader or be punished. No dissent can be tolerated."
Hollywood lent its voice as Mel Gibson and Joel Schumacher (director of Batman & Robin) held a press conference in Mullinville to rally for the governor and, apparently, against entrenched Zionist control of Hollywood.


For the rest click here.

Pompeo and Schuckman—an uncontested election contest

$
0
0


Since Kansas is a red state many of its races in the general elections are non events. That is to say that most of the Democratic challengers are unknown personalities without state-wide name recognition. The Democratic Party puts up these candidates as token efforts with no financial support. They are strictly providing a token alternative to the Republican incumbents.
In the 4th district for the US House of Representatives the Democrats put up Perry Schuckman to run against incumbent Mike Pompeo. To date I haven’t seen a single campaign commercial for Schuckman on TV or in the newspapers. I doubt if most people could name the Democratic candidate much less give an opinion of him. For that matter I haven’t seen a single commercial for Pompeo. In his arrogance Pompeo has decided he will automatically win the race so there is no need to spend money campaigning. He just assumes that he will win since he has the name recognition that comes from being an incumbent. At the same time he can bet that most of his constituents would not vote for a Democrat anyway. They are especially not likey to vote for one that has no name recognition at all. Pompeo saves money by not campaigning.
Pompeo does have his mailings that he sends out to constituents. I receive them myself. In his last two he wrote about national security, with absolutely no facts or actual debating points:
This week, I spent a fair amount of time working to ensure that Kansans are safe from radical Islamic terror--by voting to take action against radical Islamic terrorists and by participating in the first open hearing of the Benghazi Committee--but we've also made major headway in passing policies that improve Kansans' lives.
He then went right to a Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act. His taking part in the Benghazi Committee is purely political. That committee only looks for proof that President Barack Obama is somehow negligent in the attack on the Libyan Embassy on September 11, 2012. It has nothing to do with making Americans safer.
Pompeo doesn’t mention his election campaign anywhere in these mailings. He seems to act as if there really is no election or he has no real opponent.
This brings up the question of why the Democratic Party puts up candidates if they aren’t going to actively support them. I know from taking to other Democratic candidates that they like to have a candidate in all elections. But once signed up they only support the candidates who can develop name recognition and raise money. Their treatment of candidates as Schuckman are just plain unfair. Schuckman might have had a real chance if he had a good campaign with some money behind him. But his run for office is just a waste. Only a few hard core Democrats know anything about him. To allow a half assed campaign as this one only allows other Democrats to waist valuable time on this campaign when they could be working on a campaign that has a chance of winning.
This is a case of neither political party being fare to the voters of Kansas. The Republicans treat the race with arrogance that shows disrespect for the voters and the Democrats are cheating their constituents out of a real contested election.

Bonita Gooch speaks at the Peace & Social Justice Center Annual Dinner

$
0
0
The Peace and Social Justice Center has been around for years. On Friday December 5, 6pm, at Lorraine Avenue Mennonite Church,
655 S. Lorraine Ave, close living residence can come to the annual meeting. 
     This is our 22nd Annual Dinner with speaker, Bonita Gooch, editor and publisher of The Community Voice, the newspaper and heart of Wichita’s Northeast Community. Bonita will speak about police/community issues before and after the protests in Ferguson, MO, that followed the police shooting of Michael Brown in August, 2014.
      Tickets are $20 includes a delicious Mediterranean dinner. Please call 316-263-5886 or email admin@wichitapeace.org to RSVP. Seating is limited. You can reserve your place at www.wichitapeace.org, donate $20 for each and post a message.

 

Kansas- Brownback not worried about $ shortfalls

$
0
0
 
The “what—me worry?” kid, AKA Governor Sam Brownback, has probably heard that Kansas is about to have to deal with looming revenue shortfalls. During the elections he said “the sun is shining in Kansas” and most commentators are implying that he has foolishly created this mess and ignored it at the same time.
The revenue shorts have risen to about $700 million. If Brownback does what he usually does, as he has done now for most of his four years in office, he will cut education and social services to the poor, disabled and elderly. Hiss wealthy buddies, such as the Koch Brothers, can rest assured he will not raise their taxes.
Brownback only won the election by 50 percent, with the rest of the votes split between Democratic challenger Paul Davis and a libertarian candidate Keen A. Umbehr. So far he has shown no sign he will be more cautious of his right-wing revolution. He seems in no mood to worry about the 50 percent of voters who voted against him. His only concern is his Tea Party backers who poured campaign money into his re-election.
As someone who presently works in the Wichita School System as a Substitute Teacher, I have seen firsthand the damage he has done to our schools—larger classes, shortages of equipment and supplies, teachers being fired and classes being cut. This generation is getting ripped off of having the decent education their parents had.
I have a friend who had to quit working and go on government disabilities' and he is terrified that he will have his income cut and he will end up in a homeless shelter. I would say that his fears are justified.
He is destroying our schools and possibly pushing poor people into homeless shelters and the worst part is he just doesn't seem to care.

 

The confederate flag raises its ugly head

$
0
0
The confederate flag controversy is annoying and tends to distract us from the killing of innocent black people by racist individuals. But to actually look at the flag controversy it is worth noting that there is an issue here. The Southern Cross is a battle flag that is mistaken for the official flag of the Confederate States of America (CSA), a nation that was formed when several southern states broke off from theUnited States of America. That started the US Civil War that lasted about four years and cost this country more American lives than any other war in our nations history.
To begin with, the Southern Cross was only a battle flag and not an official flag of the CSA.



The first official flag of the CSA was the "The Stars and Bars:"



Later in the war, the Southern Cross was incorporated into a new CSA

flag:


And later, they decided the new flag looked too much like a surrender flag so  the final CSA flag:



The flag of controversy is the Southern Cross battle flag. It is usually used to represent the CSA. While many southerners claim this flag represent their "heritage" it also represent the past. The CSA was an attempt by several southern states to be independent of the US government. That society was dependent on slaves for its economy and no amount of "heritage" can erase that fact. The CSA was dependent on slaves for its economic success. Just recently the
The CSA was an attempt to create a separate government from the north. That alone is not racism. Attempts at succession are not rare in the world of the 19th century or the last 20th century. It was a failed government and refusing to let go of that dream shows a real resistance from the reality that that government did FAIL. Now the federal government is forcing that flag down from the officials offices ofSouth Caolina,in  the south.
In today's society this is not the only group of people to hang on to a dead dream. InWichita the city government has agreed to adopt the South VietnamRepublic ofVietnam) government, at the request of Vietnam Veteran groups who refuse to acknowledge the loss of that government after the fall of Saigon. Like those who dream of a CSA, the dream of a revival of the Republic of Vietnam


But that is not going to happen either.
It is time to give up this foolishness and except reality. There is no CSA and their is no Republic of Vietnam. So let's get on with reality.


This was from Otto's War Room.

What to the slave is the fourth of July?

$
0
0
BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS

Mr. President, Friends and Fellow Citizens:
He who could address this audience without a quailing sensation, has stronger nerves than I have. I do not remember ever to have appeared as a speaker before any assembly more shrinkingly, nor with greater distrust of my ability, than I do this day. A feeling has crept over me, quite unfavorable to the exercise of my limited powers of speech. The task before me is one which requires much previous thought and study for its proper performance. I know that apologies of this sort are generally considered flat and unmeaning. I trust, however, that mine will not be so considered. Should I seem at ease, my appearance would much misrepresent me. The little experience I have had in addressing public meetings, in country schoolhouses, avails me nothing on the present occasion.
The papers and placards say, that I am to deliver a 4th [of] July oration. This certainly sounds large, and out of the common way, for it is true that I have often had the privilege to speak in this beautiful Hall, and to address many who now honor me with their presence. But neither their familiar faces, nor the perfect gage I think I have of Corinthian Hall, seems to free me from embarrassment.
The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this platform and the slave plantation, from which I escaped, is considerable — and the difficulties to be overcome in getting from the latter to the former, are by no means slight. That I am here to-day is, to me, a matter of astonishment as well as of gratitude. You will not, therefore, be surprised, if in what I have to say I evince no elaborate preparation, nor grace my speech with any high sounding exordium. With little experience and with less learning, I have been able to throw my thoughts hastily and imperfectly together; and trusting to your patient and generous indulgence, I will proceed to lay them before you.
This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God. It carries your minds back to the day, and to the act of your great deliverance; and to the signs, and to the wonders, associated with that act, and that day. This celebration also marks the beginning of another year of your national life; and reminds you that the Republic of America is now 76 years old. I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young. Seventy-six years, though a good old age for a man, is but a mere speck in the life of a nation. Three score years and ten is the allotted time for individual men; but nations number their years by thousands. According to this fact, you are, even now, only in the beginning of your national career, still lingering in the period of childhood. I repeat, I am glad this is so. There is hope in the thought, and hope is much needed, under the dark clouds which lower above the horizon. The eye of the reformer is met with angry flashes, portending disastrous times; but his heart may well beat lighter at the thought that America is young, and that she is still in the impressible stage of her existence. May he not hope that high lessons of wisdom, of justice and of truth, will yet give direction to her destiny? Were the nation older, the patriot’s heart might be sadder, and the reformer’s brow heavier. Its future might be shrouded in gloom, and the hope of its prophets go out in sorrow. There is consolation in the thought that America is young. Great streams are not easily turned from channels, worn deep in the course of ages. They may sometimes rise in quiet and stately majesty, and inundate the land, refreshing and fertilizing the earth with their mysterious properties. They may also rise in wrath and fury, and bear away, on their angry waves, the accumulated wealth of years of toil and hardship. They, however, gradually flow back to the same old channel, and flow on as serenely as ever. But, while the river may not be turned aside, it may dry up, and leave nothing behind but the withered branch, and the unsightly rock, to howl in the abyss-sweeping wind, the sad tale of departed glory. As with rivers so with nations.
Fellow-citizens, I shall not presume to dwell at length on the associations that cluster about this day. The simple story of it is that, 76 years ago, the people of this country were British subjects. The style and title of your “sovereign people” (in which you now glory) was not then born. You were under the British Crown. Your fathers esteemed the English Government as the home government; and England as the fatherland. This home government, you know, although a considerable distance from your home, did, in the exercise of its parental prerogatives, impose upon its colonial children, such restraints, burdens and limitations, as, in its mature judgment, it deemed wise, right and proper.
But, your fathers, who had not adopted the fashionable idea of this day, of the infallibility of government, and the absolute character of its acts, presumed to differ from the home government in respect to the wisdom and the justice of some of those burdens and restraints. They went so far in their excitement as to pronounce the measures of government unjust, unreasonable, and oppressive, and altogether such as ought not to be quietly submitted to. I scarcely need say, fellow-citizens, that my opinion of those measures fully accords with that of your fathers. Such a declaration of agreement on my part would not be worth much to anybody. It would, certainly, prove nothing, as to what part I might have taken, had I lived during the great controversy of 1776. To say now that America was right, and England wrong, is exceedingly easy. Everybody can say it; the dastard, not less than the noble brave, can flippantly discant on the tyranny of England towards the American Colonies. It is fashionable to do so; but there was a time when to pronounce against England, and in favor of the cause of the colonies, tried men’s souls. They who did so were accounted in their day, plotters of mischief, agitators and rebels, dangerous men. To side with the right, against the wrong, with the weak against the strong, and with the oppressed against the oppressor! here lies the merit, and the one which, of all others, seems unfashionable in our day. The cause of liberty may be stabbed by the men who glory in the deeds of your fathers. But, to proceed.
Feeling themselves harshly and unjustly treated by the home government, your fathers, like men of honesty, and men of spirit, earnestly sought redress. They petitioned and remonstrated; they did so in a decorous, respectful, and loyal manner. Their conduct was wholly unexceptionable. This, however, did not answer the purpose. They saw themselves treated with sovereign indifference, coldness and scorn. Yet they persevered. They were not the men to look back.
As the sheet anchor takes a firmer hold, when the ship is tossed by the storm, so did the cause of your fathers grow stronger, as it breasted the chilling blasts of kingly displeasure. The greatest and best of British statesmen admitted its justice, and the loftiest eloquence of the British Senate came to its support. But, with that blindness which seems to be the unvarying characteristic of tyrants, since Pharaoh and his hosts were drowned in the Red Sea, the British Government persisted in the exactions complained of.
The madness of this course, we believe, is admitted now, even by England; but we fear the lesson is wholly lost on our present ruler.
Oppression makes a wise man mad. Your fathers were wise men, and if they did not go mad, they became restive under this treatment. They felt themselves the victims of grievous wrongs, wholly incurable in their colonial capacity. With brave men there is always a remedy for oppression. Just here, the idea of a total separation of the colonies from the crown was born! It was a startling idea, much more so, than we, at this distance of time, regard it. The timid and the prudent (as has been intimated) of that day, were, of course, shocked and alarmed by it.
Such people lived then, had lived before, and will, probably, ever have a place on this planet; and their course, in respect to any great change, (no matter how great the good to be attained, or the wrong to be redressed by it), may be calculated with as much precision as can be the course of the stars. They hate all changes, but silver, gold and copper change! Of this sort of change they are always strongly in favor.
These people were called Tories in the days of your fathers; and the appellation, probably, conveyed the same idea that is meant by a more modern, though a somewhat less euphonious term, which we often find in our papers, applied to some of our old politicians.
Their opposition to the then dangerous thought was earnest and powerful; but, amid all their terror and affrighted vociferations against it, the alarming and revolutionary idea moved on, and the country with it.
On the 2d of July, 1776, the old Continental Congress, to the dismay of the lovers of ease, and the worshipers of property, clothed that dreadful idea with all the authority of national sanction. They did so in the form of a resolution; and as we seldom hit upon resolutions, drawn up in our day whose transparency is at all equal to this, it may refresh your minds and help my story if I read it. “Resolved, That these united colonies are, and of right, ought to be free and Independent States; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown; and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, dissolved.”
Citizens, your fathers made good that resolution. They succeeded; and to-day you reap the fruits of their success. The freedom gained is yours; and you, therefore, may properly celebrate this anniversary. The 4th of July is the first great fact in your nation’s history — the very ring-bolt in the chain of your yet undeveloped destiny.
Pride and patriotism, not less than gratitude, prompt you to celebrate and to hold it in perpetual remembrance. I have said that the Declaration of Independence is the ring-bolt to the chain of your nation’s destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.
From the round top of your ship of state, dark and threatening clouds may be seen. Heavy billows, like mountains in the distance, disclose to the leeward huge forms of flinty rocks! That bolt drawn, that chain broken, and all is lost. Cling to this day — cling to it, and to its principles, with the grasp of a storm-tossed mariner to a spar at midnight.
The coming into being of a nation, in any circumstances, is an interesting event. But, besides general considerations, there were peculiar circumstances which make the advent of this republic an event of special attractiveness.
The whole scene, as I look back to it, was simple, dignified and sublime.
The population of the country, at the time, stood at the insignificant number of three millions. The country was poor in the munitions of war. The population was weak and scattered, and the country a wilderness unsubdued. There were then no means of concert and combination, such as exist now. Neither steam nor lightning had then been reduced to order and discipline. From the Potomac to the Delaware was a journey of many days. Under these, and innumerable other disadvantages, your fathers declared for liberty and independence and triumphed.
Fellow Citizens, I am not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men too — great enough to give fame to a great age. It does not often happen to a nation to raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men. The point from which I am compelled to view them is not, certainly, the most favorable; and yet I cannot contemplate their great deeds with less than admiration. They were statesmen, patriots and heroes, and for the good they did, and the principles they contended for, I will unite with you to honor their memory.
They loved their country better than their own private interests; and, though this is not the highest form of human excellence, all will concede that it is a rare virtue, and that when it is exhibited, it ought to command respect. He who will, intelligently, lay down his life for his country, is a man whom it is not in human nature to despise. Your fathers staked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor, on the cause of their country. In their admiration of liberty, they lost sight of all other interests.
They were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bondage. They were quiet men; but they did not shrink from agitating against oppression. They showed forbearance; but that they knew its limits. They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was “settled” that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were “final;” not slavery and oppression. You may well cherish the memory of such men. They were great in their day and generation. Their solid manhood stands out the more as we contrast it with these degenerate times.
How circumspect, exact and proportionate were all their movements! How unlike the politicians of an hour! Their statesmanship looked beyond the passing moment, and stretched away in strength into the distant future. They seized upon eternal principles, and set a glorious example in their defense. Mark them!
Fully appreciating the hardship to be encountered, firmly believing in the right of their cause, honorably inviting the scrutiny of an on-looking world, reverently appealing to heaven to attest their sincerity, soundly comprehending the solemn responsibility they were about to assume, wisely measuring the terrible odds against them, your fathers, the fathers of this republic, did, most deliberately, under the inspiration of a glorious patriotism, and with a sublime faith in the great principles of justice and freedom, lay deep the corner-stone of the national superstructure, which has risen and still rises in grandeur around you.
Of this fundamental work, this day is the anniversary. Our eyes are met with demonstrations of joyous enthusiasm. Banners and pennants wave exultingly on the breeze. The din of business, too, is hushed. Even Mammon seems to have quitted his grasp on this day. The ear-piercing fife and the stirring drum unite their accents with the ascending peal of a thousand church bells. Prayers are made, hymns are sung, and sermons are preached in honor of this day; while the quick martial tramp of a great and multitudinous nation, echoed back by all the hills, valleys and mountains of a vast continent, bespeak the occasion one of thrilling and universal interest — a nation’s jubilee.
Friends and citizens, I need not enter further into the causes which led to this anniversary. Many of you understand them better than I do. You could instruct me in regard to them. That is a branch of knowledge in which you feel, perhaps, a much deeper interest than your speaker. The causes which led to the separation of the colonies from the British crown have never lacked for a tongue. They have all been taught in your common schools, narrated at your firesides, unfolded from your pulpits, and thundered from your legislative halls, and are as familiar to you as household words. They form the staple of your national poetry and eloquence.
I remember, also, that, as a people, Americans are remarkably familiar with all facts which make in their own favor. This is esteemed by some as a national trait — perhaps a national weakness. It is a fact, that whatever makes for the wealth or for the reputation of Americans, and can be had cheap! will be found by Americans. I shall not be charged with slandering Americans, if I say I think the American side of any question may be safely left in American hands.
I leave, therefore, the great deeds of your fathers to other gentlemen whose claim to have been regularly descended will be less likely to be disputed than mine!
My business, if I have any here to-day, is with the present. The accepted time with God and his cause is the ever-living now.
From Kasama, for the rest click here.

The Daily Show-Donald Trump-made into a chump


Another great Fourth of July in Kansas

$
0
0

Last night I had a good Fourth of July (Independence Day) celebration. We had a good spread of food, with pulled pork, bratwurst and potato salad. During the day we set off firecrackers, smoke bombs, cluster bombs and parachutes. During the night we set off all kinds of fountains, rockets, Roman candles, sparklers and buzz bombs.
So was this more about fireworks or an independence day celebration. Our fore fathers did break away from England. They also broke away clean from feudalism and aristocracy. They even inspired the French Revolution. And in the beginning it was a mostly white-man's government. Still we celebrate anyway.
Today I wonder how much of that revolution still seems similar. The father of our country, George Washington, told us to avoid foreign entanglements:

"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities"

-We just ignore that.
Last year, members of the Royal family came to this country and the news teams fell all over them as if they were our god appointed rulers. Thomas Paine would have rolled over in his grave. Here is what he said about kings:

"But there is another and greater distinction for which no truly natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is, the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad the distinctions of heaven; but how a race of men came into the world so exalted above the rest, and distinguished like some new species, is worth enquiring into, and whether they are the means of happiness or of misery to mankind.
In the early ages of the world, according to the scripture chronology, there were no kings; the consequence of which was there were no wars; it is the pride of kings which throw mankind into confusion. Holland without a king hath enjoyed more peace for this last century than any of the monarchical governments in Europe."

And I firmly go along with that.

US capitalism's culture of consumerism is made possible by modern day advertising

$
0
0

Commercialism is an ever increasing part of USculture. I turn on a TV and there is a commercial. I go to watch a Youtube video and I see a commercial. Not only are there print ads on the internet, many have video with sound. We can't escape it.
I grew up in front of a TV in St. Louis, MO.We had five stations. One was the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) then a local station, Channel 11 (KPLR) and then the three main networks, ABC, NBC and CBS.
It could have been argued that TV was free due to commercials. We would buy a set, bring it home turn it on and there were these free shows--minus about 10 to 20 minutes of advertising. As a kid we never watched PBS. Sometimes we watched the local channel in the afternoon for some cartoons. It was the main three networks that we watched the most of. I always found the commercials annoying and I didn't understand their purpose as a little kid. When I finally figured out what they were supposed to be I realized it was cheaper than paying for TV shows.
That was before cable. Now I PAY for an assortment of shows, with many stations of which I never watch. Yet I still have to put up with commercials. There seems to be more commercials than ever and yet we pay for TV.
I was watching a late night show at least two times in the past few years when there were at least 20 minutes or more of commercials in ONE break. Remember we now pay for TV and yet we seem to have more commercials than ever.
Then comes the internet and we have what seems to be even more commercials. They are on almost every page. They often pop up while I am trying to read something and they annoy me greatly. They pop up and annoy me all the time without warning. They appear before videos or before movies start. They are the same ads, often the ones we see all day on TV. Ads appear on clothes, walls, billboards, racing cars, objects such as glasses in a bar, the list is endless. Ads are everywhere and advertisers are learning to place them in new and different places almost daily.
Because of the nature of the internet and free song downloads, most musical groups of any kind now sell their songs for TV commercials. Record albums used to bring in enough money that a group didn't need to sell their songs for commercials. Now I can't count the number of car ads with stylish pop music from the '70s, '80s or present.
I started listening to rock music in 1969, mostly. All through the 1970s I almost never heard my favorite bands playing for cars, shoes or medicines. There are those who try to argue that my generations music just hadn't come to be recognized for its potential yet and a lot of older pop music was already being used from the 1940s and early 1950s.
But there were those who were critical of commercialism and consumerism even back in the 1970s. Frank Zappa was always criticizing things he thought were "commercial"[1]and he used that word in many of his songs. He also used the word "plastic"which had a similar meaning (also means frivolous or shallow). The Beatles would not let their music be used for commercials. There were others who felt their music had too much meaning ("heavy" we used to say).
Today our society has turned such rock music on its head. There are few musicians who keep their songs from commercial use and most can't afford not to. During the 1970s "heavy rock" indicated that the music was to be taken seriously and the lyrics might take on important issues of the day, such as war, violence or hypocrisy in our society.
I also notice their use for such ads as medicines used to keep senior citizens alive. Lots of medicines are being advertised with such rock groups as Dire Straits, for a Farxiga ad.
Does this mean that the "youth culture, music and fashion from the 1970s" are now replaced by senior citizens who listen to past "heavy rock" bands of the 1970s while sitting in the coffee shops? The answer is yes.
Then their is the infomercial. Traditionally sponsors used a popular TV show to act as medium for which the advertiser pitches were placed around. Now a growing group of sponsors or just skipping the popular show altogether for a long commercial that is supposed to be entertaining. The shows are usually made to look as if they were an actual news event, cooking show or just an information show on how to use the product. They often use an audience and interact with the people. Many of us feel they are an insult to our intelligence and yet there are enough people watching these shows that they are on the increase.
Commercials often make the use of sex, celebrities, cute children and they often employ humor or wit. But commercials are not always designed to be popular or entertaining. Some advertisers have deliberately used annoying commercials to get people's attention. A few years ago they had a TV ad, in Wichita, with an annoying loud mouthed "Susie Soundtrack." Almost everyone I knew hated that commercial. And yet a friend tried to work for the company that used her and was told that 'she sells a lot of equipment.'
Repetitions is important to the advertiser. We don't see many ads just once. We see them several times during a one hour show. Most people try and tune them out but the repetition seems to work and it works well even if it is really annoying.
Since advertisement is used to sell merchandise or services it doesn't have to be entertaining. It just has to sell.
A lot of people don't seriously consider that advertisement is not just about informing potential customers of the products. Many companies use techniques to convince people that they need things that they could really do without. This is especially true of car and fast food ads. Do most people really need a new car just because they are on sale or the newest trend? Is fast food about getting a badly needed lunch or about buying more food than you really should ingest?
For the most part the message is to 'by more than you need, consume all you can.' This is how commercialism or consumerism works and flourishes. Needless to say commercialism and consumerism are a major part of modern capitalist society. It hardly needs to be said that some commercials are deceptive. Some products don't really work the way they are portrayed. But in an ultra-capitalist society honesty is not a necessity. In fact it is rare. People who make claims about medicines they found out they needed may turn out to be actors who are lying about their experiences. Sometimes the lies are so subtle most people don't notice them. Bartles and Jaymes ran ads that implied they were part of a mom and pop operation and made by a small business. But in fact their product was made by Gallo, a mega-corporation. In advertising deception is everywhere.
Advertisers often hire professionals to analyze the audience they want to attract so they can make ads that will appeal especially to them. Beer ads are aimed at young men. They will show a bunch of "the guys" hanging out at a sports event or a sports bar. They often give the implication that their beer can help them attract women.
Today ads try and create a culture around them. American Family Insurance has been running a campaign "TO DREAM FEARLESSLY."They promote the capitalist idea of "the American dream" so they can insure what ever someone finally ends up with. This is more than just selling insurance. They are promoting capitalist culture designed to increase support for its system, that serves the insurance company so well.
This brings us to political ads. Both US political parties rely on the same type of advertising as corporations. But the parties, especially Republicans, have used slick advertising and repetition to convince people that their ideology is fact rather than opinion. They have been very successful. A few years ago they kept saying that 'history shows us that government can't get us out of a recession.' World War II provides history that shows us the opposite. Both Adolf Hitler and Franklin Roosevelt used government programs to put people back to work.
Today's crass consumer society is fuelled by the constant exposure to advertising. We are bombarded daily with messages telling us to buy stuff whether we need it or not. More than just selling us products they are re-enforcing their consumer ideology. While Zappa complained about the frivolous commercialism of the day's music- on the other side of that issue was a lack of substance, of importance, of consciousness. Important issues of the day are neglected for superficial messages from societies idols to just buy stuff.
The main message is to buy things to be happy and content. Poverty, war and injustice can easily be ignored if our favorite pop stars are telling us how to be happy as an individual. The only real purpose in life becomes the quest for health and the ownership of things.
We must produce our own culture that is free of advertising and hucksterism. It is time to expose the snake-oil salesmen of our day. We can't end the consumer culture over-night, but we can expose it and its supporters every chance we get. We can also work hard in our local communities to produce anti-consumer—anti-commercial art and culture.

 FARXIGA COMMERCIAL


Pepsi Commercial HD - We Will Rock You (feat. Britney Spears, Beyonce, Pink & Enrique Iglesias)

TracyChapman-Mountains O' Things





[1]Captain Beefheartwas rejected, early in his career by Dot Records for having "no commercial potential."Frank Zappa used that quote on the sleeve of his first album, Freak Out!

Kansas Gov. Brownback is on the wrong side of gay marriage issue

$
0
0
By Otto

Conservatives across the country are trying to save face as the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of gay marriage.
This ruling has been an obvious setback for Republicans and the religious right who have opposed any recognition of gay marriage or any other forms of gay rights. Most of congress's conservative Republicans have built up support from conservative churches by supporting their right to discriminate against what they see as "a sin." The Supreme Court has struck at the heart of the Republican Party platform.
As an example, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback is taking steps to cover his tracks and prevent the affects of the Supreme Court decision.
The AP reported that Kansas' Governor (Brownback) told state government agencies Tuesday that they can't punish ministers or religious groups for opposing same-sex marriage, and critics said he is sanctioning discrimination even as the state extends new benefits to gay and lesbian couples. Brownback issued an executive order in response to last month's U.S. Supreme Court ruling. It is actually a mild action considering Kansasreligious conservative's opposition to any form of gay rights.
Brownback has steadily opposed gay marriage on the grounds that Kansans have voted against it in past elections and he has claimed he is just upholding the will of the Kansaspeople.
But many of us have argued that the rights of minority people should not be put to a vote.[1] Such people are protected by the constitution. We don't vote on the rights of Afro-Americans and we shouldn't. Constitutional protection of minorities is not up to popular support. If it were most minority people would not have any rights. Minorities are often not popular with mainstream Americans and that is why such groups need protection in the first place.
Gay marriage is just one more example of cracks in the conservative Republican's armor. The Republicans have taken over US Congress, state houses and governorships throughout the country. Except for the presidency and the US Supreme Court, right-wing Republicans have locked up this country's political power and systems. Now they are starting to lose their own culture war. Marijuana laws are beginning to get relaxed due to public pressure and now they have lost their ability to discriminate against gays. Their power is not invincible after all.

The Times They Are A Changin' - Tracy Chapman





[1]See also A referendum is not the way to go when it comes to gay rights or minority issues, The Guardian, Iowa Senate Majority Leader On Gay Marriage: Minority Rights Should Not Be Put To Popular Vote, Think Progress.

.


Heroin overdoses up—leading to press sensationalism and government repression

$
0
0

From Otto's War Room:

 

As I read in the news recently, heroin use is up. Heroin can be a deadly drug (it is easy to overdose on it), and that means overdose deaths have also increased. This makes news, both local, state and national. It can also lead to mainstream news media hype.
From decade to decade there is always some kind of drugs that users flock to. In the 1980s it was crack cocaine. Later it was methamphetamine. Now it is heroin. The problem is that such news usually causes unnecessary hype in the news media followed by over reactions by our elected officials.
Mandatory minimum sentencing and restrictions on over-the-counter cold medicines are examples of actions or overreactions by legislators trying to deal with these drug epidemics.
The latest hype-fad is to link new heroin use with legal pain medicines manufactured for chronic pain.
According to a Reuters report:

"Such medicines, which include Vicodin, OxyContin and Percocet, increase individuals’ susceptibility to heroin addiction, Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told Reuters.
“Everything we see points to more accessible, less-expensive heroin all over the country,” Frieden said of the joint report by the CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration which analyzed national survey data on drug use from 2002 to 2013.
The report found that nearly all people (96 percent) who use heroin also use multiple other substances, and that the strongest risk factor for heroin abuse is prescription opiate abuse."

The article then claims that people who use or abuse prescription painkillers are 40 times more likely to use heroin. But what statistics or facts do they present to back up that claim? The article presents statistics taken to show that the use of heroin is in fact increasing. Hospitals have recorded increases in heroin overdoses. But much of what it says about prescription drugs, such as OxyContin, seem more opinion than fact. And I would definitely challenge such opinions.
This doesn't sound much different from the old arguments that marijuana leads to heroin. That argument still gets made and it is totally illogical. It is true that many hard drug users start with marijuana. But many people today smoke marijuana and never use anything harder. Also people who sell hard drugs are also likely to sell marijuana.
But this 'one-leads-to-the-other' chain of events is simply bogus.
First of all, prescription narcotics have an intended use. They are for serious pain. And there are people who really need those drugs to deal with that pain. Preventing patients from getting those drugs amounts to torture. Then there are people who use and abuse such drugs when they can get them on the black market or from friends. Most of these people do not jump from prescription narcotics to heroin. Many of the people, who use prescription narcotics, don't know where to get heroin. Also their is still a great stigma (the perception that this drug is the most dangerous and most addictive) to heroin use that does not surround the use of prescription narcotics.
I used to take part in the drug culture so I am familiar with the patterns of such drug users.[1]Some people do use both prescription narcotics and heroin. Many people on heroin will use prescription narcotics if they are available and heroin is not. But the stigma of heroin keeps a lot of prescription narcotic users from seeking it when their narcotics of choice are not available.
All this hype is probably going to lead to more restrictions on prescription drugs that are already classified as CII (schedule II),[2] the most restricted classification of pharmaceutical drugs. Heroin is CI meaning that it is can not be prescribed because it is considered to dangerous for medical use.
I have known people who have had cancer and they had trouble finding doctors who were willing to prescribe drugs to deal with their pain. Already some doctors are afraid of coming under the suspicion of the DEA so they don't like to prescribe any pain killers. That is a problem that many patients, who need these medicines, have. One proposal to stop people from getting narcotics would be to keep them from "doctor shopping" for those who will give them the pain killers they seek. Again the problem is that some patients with pain really need those drugs and their doctor may not want to prescribe them. I knew a cancer patient that had this problem. If he could not have gone to a different doctor, how was he supped to get the pain medicine he needed?
According to Reuters:

"He (Frieden) said doctors are prescribing “way too much of these medications, and the result of it is large numbers of people who are addicted.”

And what exactly does this mean. Are doctors writing prescriptions without any proof of pain? Are they giving out OxyContin for mild head aches? Or is this statement jus his opinion?
The usual pattern on these drug epidemics is the press begins pouring out  a lot of hype about the drug and it dangers. As with heroin the dangers are real. While other prescription drugs may also have their dangers and can also be addictive, the press is likely to exaggerate those dangers. This will whip the public into panic mode. Then lawmakers will come up with draconian measures that will infringe on people's constitutional rights, putting more people in jail and putting a lot of needless red tape against those who actually need these drugs. Drug abuse in Americausually leads to sensationalism by the press and repression by the government.
We need to oppose both.




[1]See Steve Otto, War on Drugs or War on People?, (Ide House, Las Colinas, Texas)
1995.
[2] Drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make drugs are classified into five distinct categories or schedules. schedule V is the least restrictive and schedule II is the most. Schedule I is banned from pharmaceutical use.

Contraception helps health- happiness- sex ed. panel coming to Wichita

$
0
0
By Julie Burkhart


We've known for a long time that access to contraception and reproductive health education lower the rate of unplanned pregnancies.  In Colorado, a recent program to allow young women access to free contraception has dramatically lowered the state's teen birth rate.  Unfortunately, anti-choice lawmakers are working to end funding for the program.  

Anti-choicers still diligently work to deny women true reproductive freedom, which inhibits a higher quality of life.  States actually save around seven dollars of public health care funding for one every dollar they spend on contraception.  

It's clear that education about contraceptive options and sexual health actually help people live healthier lives.  At South Wind Women's Center, we help every patient choose a contraceptive method for managing their fertility.  Many of our patients have not had adequate education about their reproductive health.  

Sex is still taboo in many parts of this country, and ignorance abounds. To combat this serious problem in our community, we are hosting a sex ed panel in Wichita on August 27 at 6:30 pm at the Riverside Park Villa. Our event is called S is for Sex, E is for Education and X is for XOXO. We want to provide an open community forum to discuss a variety of topics and answer questions people might have about sex and contraception.  We will have a number of reproductive health experts from the community on the panel. We want to provide a safe space for people to ask questions and learn about sexuality and sex without stigma or fear of judgment. Please click here for more information about our panel! 

Julie A. Burkhart
Founder and CEO

Trust Women and South Wind Women's Center


Debates on the 2 party system to be challenged

$
0
0
It is about time someone challenged the two party system. This is the system where the news media won't invite candidates to a debate if they are not Democrat or Republican. They also won't invite people who have not raised enough money "to be taken seriously as a candidate."
-Otto



The Fair Debates project is SERIOUS about changing the game. Join us in the fight by contributing $10 (or more) today at https://fundly.com/oai-presidential-debate-commission. 

We mean business! Check out the plan at
www.fairdebates.com/the-plan.html Want to do more? Become a "fundraiser" by clicking on the link in the Fundly campaign - and go down in history as someone who helped take back our elections!

ps... if your friends don't know why the Presidential Debates have been an exclusive show for ONLY two parties, invite them to visit 
www.FairDebates.com to learn more. Then ask them to join us in the fight for Fair Debates!


The Revolution Will Not Be Televised-Updated

$
0
0
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
By Gil Scott-Heron

This was a word-song from 1970. I updated it for a reading at the open mic night at Kirby's as a part of my performance art events. The open mic got cancelled so I'm posting this anyway. I really like this.-Otto

You will not be able to stay home, brother
You will not be able to plug in your Ipad and cop out
You will not be able to lose yourself on a hit a' dope
And skip out for beer during commercials
Because the revolution will not be televised

The revolution will not be televised
The revolution will not be brought to you by dancing with the stars
In 6 episodes with lots'a commercial interruptions
The revolution will not show you pictures of Obama
Blowing a bugle and leading a charge by John Mccain
Scott Walker and Joe Biden to eat hog maws
Confiscated from a Harlem sanctuary
The revolution will not be televised

The revolution will not be brought to you by the
Koch Arena and will not star Ted Nugent
And Kid Rock or Bullwinkle and Sponge Bob
The revolution will not give your mouth sex appeal
The revolution will not get rid of pimples
And make the girls wanna fuck you
The revolution will not make you look 12 pounds thinner
Because the revolution will not be televised, Brother

There will be no pictures of you and  Royals manager Ned Yost
Pushing that shopping cart down the block on the dead run
Or trying to slide that color TV into a stolen ambulance
NBC will not be able predict the winner at 8:32
Or report from 29 districts
The revolution will not be televised

There will be no pictures of cops shooting down
Blacks on the instant replay
There will be no pictures of cops shooting down
Blacks on the instant replay
There will be no pictures of  Cornel West
Being run out of Harlem on a rail with a brand new process
There will be no slow motion or still life of Jesse Jackson
Strolling through Watts in a red, black and green Kwame Nkrumah
T-shirt that he has been saving
For just the proper occasion

The Voice, American Idol and Biggest Loser
Will no longer be so damned relevant
And women will not care if Dick finally gets down with Jane
On search for tomorrow because people
Will be in the street looking for a brighter day
The revolution will not be televised

There will be no highlights on the eleven o'clock news
And Michelle Obama blowing her nose
The theme song will not be written by Pharrell Williams
Francis Scott Key, nor sung by Hank Williams Jr., Beyoncé,
Taylor Swift, Englebert What'is'dink or Aerosmith
The revolution will not be televised

The revolution will not be right back after a message
About a white tornado, white lightning, or white people
You will not have to worry about a Shark Vacuum sweeper in your bedroom
Flow the insurance girl or the Ty-D-Bowl man
The revolution will not go better with Coke
The revolution will not fight the germs that may cause bad breath
The revolution WILL put you in the driver's seat

The revolution will not be televised, will not be televised
Will not be televised, will not be televised
The revolution will be no re-run brothers
The revolution will be live
The original:


Pluto at last- ten years and billions of miles

$
0
0
When I was a kid I learned about all the planets and was amazed at how cold the planet (now just a dwarf planet) Pluto was supposed to be. I imagined it to be mostly ice. It still just looks like a ball of colored chemicals, no atmosphere- not liquid water, rivers or oceans. Maybe there are craters like the Moon. Still it is interesting to see what the little planet actually looks like, after years of being just a white dot on some pictures taken from telescopes. -Otto



Close-up photo of Pluto.

Idiot Conservative news anchor’s message to Obama goes viral

$
0
0
What an asshole and racist. This woman is one of the most anti-religious freedom and inept person on foreign affairs. -  -Otto
From Yahoo News:

Sedgwick County Commissioners legalize neglect

$
0
0
By Otto

The Sedgwick County Commission got slammed by the local newspaper The Wichita Eagle for putting a budget together that picks takes from the health and quality of life as they took funds away from organizations that have had adequate funding in the past.
Yes...we still have a county commission. It covers the entire county, including Wichita. Since all the cities in Sedgwick keep expending, the county commission covers less area and has less importance every year. On the bad side of it is that people keep electing the same mean-spirited poor-hating politicians that get elected for all the other branches of government in Kansas.
The commissioners have cut health and arts programs. They decided to let the Federal Government should pay for roads and bridges, even though they have condemned the Federal Government as a great evil. Now they are going let that evil government fix all the problems they don't want to mess with.
The Wichita Eaglereported the words of Commission Chairman Richard Ranzau who said;
"I would argue this county is at this time moving to the center. We're moving the country back towards the center, back to the core American Values."
Then he blamed "moving to the left," for obscuring American Values.
Ranzau has an active imagination. This county has NEVER MOVE LEFT in 30 years. The USpolitical spectrum has lunged far to the right and that is the direction he and his chums are moving the county. They are moving towards neglect, hatred of the poor and the worship of an artless robotic mindless nation of autotrons, all lacking imagination as much as the far right politicians.
He also talked about "fiscal responsibility, individual freedom, property rights, individual responsibility, limited government." I wonder what he means by freedom—the freedom to neglect those in need?!?



Our County Commissioners Plan for the future—and what a vision they have?!—the freedom of neglect. Pix from abandonednyc.com

Paranoia - Living By The Sword

Bernie Sanders campaign gets a start in Wichita

$
0
0


by Otto

A large crowd turned out last night (Wednesday) for a live pod cast of Bernie Sanders, at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex of Wichita State University.  About 90 people attended the event, which was hosted by Jim Phillips and Dotty Billings. Both hosts have worked in Democratic Socialists of America.
The majority of the audience was interested in supporting the local campaign for Bernie Sanders, presently the independent senator from Vermont. After the pod cast Phillips explained that WSU had a NEW policy against any kind of fund raising or organizing on the campus. This new policy has come down after pressure from conservative politicians who tried to use the campus for their own fund raising, earlier.
Phillips invited the crow to go to the Peace and Social Justice Center, for an organizational meeting. There were about 25 people went to the organization meeting and many were young people there, even members of the Young Democrats. Discussions focused mostly on reaching out to the Democratic Party in the Wichita area and other parts of Kansas. The campaign will focus a lot on young voters.

So far there seems to be a lot of enthusiasm in this area for building a movement to get Sanders (or Bernie as his supporters call him) on the ballot and elected in the primary.


Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live