Quantcast
Channel: The Idiot Factor: Corruption Folly
Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live

The myth of “individualism” in the economy

$
0
0

The idea that we can choose to be "individualists" in our economy and we don't need collective thinking is part of the “free-market” capitalist, ideology. This ideology is a tool of the Republicans and conservatives, in and outside of this country, to co-opt or dupe workers into supporting their agenda. And that agenda is the pro-capitalist, pro-business and anti-worker policies we get today from the Republican Party. But why do workers support this? Do they really want to be fired at any time without any warnings? Do they really want to cut out all benefits from the work place including health care? Quite often we are told that conservative workers see themselves as individualist who opposes any kind of collectivism.
To put it clearly R.J. Saulnier said:

“What Republicans stand for derives from their adherence to individualism, the philosophy that perceives of the individual as a self-disciplined, basically self-reliant person who has rights and freedoms that it is the duty of government to respect and protect, who respects the rights and freedoms of others, and who feels an obligation to attend so far as possible to his/her own individual and family welfare. It is this embrace of individualism that sets Republicans apart from those who favor government that is big, centralized, intrusive, and increasingly paternalistic. What Republicans stand for is precisely the opposite–government that is limited, noninterventionist and decentralized.”

When he said “self-reliant person” what does that really mean? Do they make their own clothes? Do they build their own cars from scratch? Do they grow their own food? Chances are they consume products every day that requires a work force to make. Even a small business person has to acknowledge that. Each business creates a piece of the economy and the only people in the country who don’t buy and consume those goods are the hermits that live off in caves and never see another human being. But that’s not what we have here in Kansasor anywhere else.
There is little doubt that by “self-disciplined” Saulnier does not mean the people on welfare or other government assistance. The American worker has learned to hate those people as un-disciplined people who they believe are just lazy and lacking in moral character. Some Republicans have a tendency to insult supporters of the Democratic Party by insisting they are all on government assistance waiting for handouts.
Most people on assistance have paid some taxes at one time or another. Most have worked at least some time in their lives. Many people on assistance, such as food stamps, are working and they are earning minimum wage. Few people are on assistance their whole lives, especially with all the new rules both national and state-wide, that place limits on welfare.
Welfare recipients and those on assistance also spend money which gives back to the government in the form of sales tax and they add to the economy. Working people have to make the products that those on assistance buy. Without consumers such work provides products which can’t be purchased.
In this way we are all interconnected. Most Republican workers will accept un-employment if they are fired or laid off.  In this modern economy few “individualist” conservative workers can afford not to take unemployment.
What this all means is that economic “individualism” is just a myth. Perhaps a person can be an individualist in arts or culture but not economically. Anyone has the right to be responsible for him/her self, but that does not have anything to do with economic individualism. We are all dependent on those who provide the things we buy with our money. If we are sick we go to a doctor. Trying to cure yourself because of your individualism is foolish and can lead to death. Almost no one can really claim to be completely free of anyone else’s help. We need others to survive and that is fact. Whether we always work or whether we get our income another way, we all depend on each other.
It is time to expose the “individualism” myth.




Britain’s Labor Party turns to a democratic socialist

$
0
0
There are some similarities between what is happening in the British Labor Party and the Bernie Sanders Campaign in the US. Of course there are differences between Bernie and Corbyn. Still I am posting this article for all to read. Maybe we started something in the US. -Otto


By the end of the campaign for the leadership of the Labour Party, it was no surprise, even for his most stubborn and malevolent critics, that Jeremy Corbyn would win the election. But the scale of his victory, 59.5% in the first round, was a resounding shock. Despite the dire warnings of a string of Labour Party pro-imperialist grandees, 49.6% of party members supported Corbyn, as did 83.8% of registered supporters and 57.6% of affiliated union voters. The Blairite and openly ruling class candidate Liz Kendall was utterly trounced, obtaining a miserable 4.5% of the vote. Together, the other two establishment, pro-austerity candidates, Yvette Cooper and the one-time favourite to win, Andy Burnham, shared 36%.

The reactions were immediate. Within hours, the Conservative Party was presenting Corbyn’s politics as a threat to national security. The ruling class was outraged. Eleven shadow front bench members resigned, refusing to work with Corbyn. Their passing will not be mourned: among their number were Liz Kendall, Yvette Cooper, the openly reactionary shadow Works and Pensions Secretary Rachel Reeves, shadow education secretary Tristram Hunt and shadow business secretary Chuku Umunna, who had been a leadership candidate for 24 hours before passing the Blairite baton to Kendall. Good riddance to them. Most Labour MPs, an unprincipled bunch of frauds and self-serving careerists intent only on feathering their nests, were horrified at Corbyn’s success. 178 of them abstained in a parliamentary vote on the vicious benefit cuts announced in the July budget – they have only contempt for the plight of the poorest sections of the working class, despising them as scroungers and shirkers.
For the rest click here.

Scott Walker may be through- Good riddance!

$
0
0
By Otto

Yahoo News has noticed that GOP favorite Scott Walker got little notice at the recent debate. He didn’t get to say much:

“Indeed, according to data from Google Trends, the third- and fourth-most-asked questions about Walkerat one point during the debate were, "What happened to Scott Walker?" and "Where is Scott Walker?"Walkerwas the least mentioned candidate on Twitter. He lagged behind most other candidates on Facebook as well.”
And as well as doing poor in a badly needed debate night, he may eventually lose his corporate funding he needs to make a serious run for president. And to that I say “It couldn’t happen to a better candidate.”

Of all the candidates Walkerhas got to be among the worst. He is squarely in the pockets of the Koch brothers. He has carried out the same kind of reforms we have seen in Kansas from Governor Sam Brownback. He has successfully “knee capped” (as the Koch brothers like to say) all the public unions. He has attacked teacher’s tenure, not unlike Brownback who in Kansas has stripped teachers of any due process if they are fired as a result of any complaint by parents. In Kansasteachers are leaving the state in droves. They are probably leaving Wisconsin as well. And as in Kansas, even though Walker has deeply offended most public workers, he was re-elected by sheepish Republican followers.
Today, in both states and elsewhere, the trend is to get rid of benefits, seniority, healthcare and a livable wage. They seem to want workers they can fire at anytime. They don’t want workers to get comfortable on the job nor earn more than a beginner’s salary. When the workers gets a little older and starts to wear out they are to be thrown to the street and easily replaced with younger more eager ones. What I don’t understand at all — is why any working person would vote for such people.
Walkers message is not all that different from others in the GOP. But each time a truly evil and despicable politician goes down 'an angle gets its wings' (at least in my imagination). Most of the GOP are corporate stooges out to make life miserable for workers and poor people. The good thing about Donald Trump is that he acts like a buffoon and yet the established suites of the GOP look even worse for having set him up to win the nomination.
To WalkerI say "Good riddance" and I seriously hope we have hear the last from him and anyone like him. I hope he gets so discouraged he goes home with his tail between his legs and learns to STAY HOME. We don't want him.

Wichita still feeding off the teats of the Koch Brothers

$
0
0
Once again our local newspaper, The Wichita Eagle, has supported the two most dangerous people in the UStoday Charles and David Koch. They have pursued a pro-business, anti-worker agenda. Worst of all they are destroying the democratic practices in this country by throwing $billions into our elections to buy off candidates and make them win.
These destructive people spend some of their billions trying to win over the city by donating to building construction. But that is not without big benefits. Their name is now on a large number of buildings all across Wichita, a city that have locked up tight.
From The WichitaEagle:

"The Kochs and the arts have a proud, long-running partnership in Wichita, in part because visual art was such a passion of the late Mary Koch. Now Liz and Charles Koch and the family foundations are giving $10.5 million in land and funding for a new home for the Wichita Center for the Arts, on a prime open site at 13th and Rock."

In The New York Timesarticle calls Wichita"Kochville," and lists buildings that contain the Koch brother's names on them;

"...Not far away is the KochCommunityPlazaand KochScoutingCenter. Then there is the Koch Orangutan and Chimpanzee Habitat at the robustly Koch-supported Sedgwick County Zoo. Stop off for swimming lessons at the Koch Aquatic Center at the North Branch Y.M.C.A., or a learning experience recognizing the ecological interests of Fred Koch and his wife, Mary, at the Great Plains Nature Center’s Koch Habitat Hall..."

And we could add the Koch Arena at WichitaStateUniversitywhere the Koch brothers have bought a lot of influence and can now get their rivals kicked off the university and they have.
Their contributions are made to make sure they get a positive public image, free advertising and they can made demands on any institution that may cross them. It's no different from prostitution the money is good, but there is also the shame and degradation. When a billionaire has his name all over the city on buildings honoring him it becomes obvious that he is trying to buy up the town and own it. At leas we wish more people would see that. -Otto

Hulse's article tries to look at both sides in the Koch brothers buying up Wichita:


"In Wichita, Koch Influence Is Revered and Reviled"
WICHITA, Kan.— In national politics, playing in Charles Koch’s arena can mean saturation advertising against vulnerable Democrats, calls for tax cuts, demands to roll back government regulation and bitter clashes over climate change.
Here in the windswept hometown of the Koch family and Koch Industries, playing in Charles Koch Arena means something else entirely."

For the rest click here.

The New York Times article mentions the film "Koch Brothers Exposed:"

High Across The Prairie- "Memoirs Of A Drugged-Up, Sex Crazed Yippie" - Review

$
0
0
by Tim Pouncey

Kansas in the late 1970's was so different from today; the SunflowerState might as well have been located in Holland.

Remember what it was like to share drugs with close friends and complete strangers? Remember when casual sex was so casual you didn't even know your partners name? Remember when the political climate of Kansascame down squarely on the side of tolerance? Remember when your personal philosophy of life was defined by rock lyrics and not a mission statement?

You don't?

Well, Steve Otto does.

In his latest semi-fictional novel, Memoirs Of A Drugged-Up, Sex Crazed Yippie (Authorhouse Press/2005), Otto excavates 1970's counterculture like an archeologist loving dusting off a Mastodon tusk. In a brisk 349 pages, Otto gives us a lucid look at a Kansas few people remember --- or can't remember due to a plentiful supply of "controlled substances" that were constantly and cheaply available. Characters romp through Wichita, Lawrence and even SedaliaMissouriwhen a cheap thrill was worth what you paid for it and pleasure was just the flipside of danger.

But to dismiss this book as just another nostalgic stoner reminiscing about the last days of the counter-culture would be a major mistake. Although there is a certain "back-in-the-day" wistfulness about the time before political correctness was a mantra, Otto tempers his dreamy history lesson with brutal honesty.

The narrator of the story --- a composite of just about every old druggie you ever met --- may graphically describe the bliss of mainlining MDA, he also reminds us that brief moment of pleasure most often occurred in a squalid apartment at broken kitchen table next to sink full of dirty dishes.

Like all good storytellers, Otto takes the reader places they've never been before. Like William Burroughs and Charles Bukowsky, Otto sometimes takes you to places you've never really wanted to visit. Yet, Otto makes it worth the trip by including generous portions of political discourse, Cyrenaic philosophy, post-adolescent lust and near-suicidal thrill seeking to keep the narrative moving along like a junkie careening through a police roadblock.

Otto's work is always provocative and this book will undoubtedly draw the wrath of both solid conservatives and neo-feminists. Otto's characters never mask their contempt for the right-wing agenda and Otto's narrator never hides his obsession with female anatomy. However, criticizing Memoirs because it baits conservatives and objectifies women is missing the point. Filtering 1970's Kansas counterculture through the sensibilities of a naive middle-class, catholic school educated, twenty-something is no easy trick but Otto mostly pulls it off. He has a good ear for times-past and tries --- often successfully --- to make his prose read like it would have been written by someone experiencing these situations 30 years ago. Trying to be simultaneously innovative, entertaining and honest is a juggling act on a unicycle, but Otto is generally at his best when everything's up-in-the-air and he's peddling frantically. When the narrator's budding Marxist politics and his discussions with Iranian nationalists clash with his dawning awareness that Kansaspolitics has taken a sharp turn to the right, Otto makes it work.

Is Otto's look into the rear-view mirror a true reflection on the 70's, or do the objects simply appear bigger than they were? Ultimately, it doesn't matter. Memoirs resonates with characters buckling under the weight of the America Dream with redemption harder to find than next snort of Cocaine.



Memoirs costs $18.95 to $12.95 on sale can be found at these sites:



In defense of Wichita’s only abortion clinic

$
0
0


I received this letter from Julie Burkhart and I am posting it here. -Otto

Julie A. Burkhart, Founder and CEO, Trust Women and South Wind Women's Center: 

Each of us put our intentions and actions into the world everyday.  What we do has consequences and shapes the world around us. Our actions may be large or small, but they make a difference.  Even choosing to do nothing is an action in it's own way.  Some times our most profound actions, the ones that change the course of our lives or of someone else's life, come when we answer a call and say yes.  Dr. Tiller became an abortion provider because his father's patients asked him for help.  He became a later abortion provider because patients asked him for his help.  

I know that each of you have answered a call at some point to join this movement. At Trust Women, we are all here because we said yes.  We opened South Wind Women's Center so that people who needed care would have a place they could turn to when they need it most. In most cases, we only know a few facts about our patients' lives. We know they need our help.  That's enough for us.  We know that whatever happens later in our patients' lives, this moment was one where they received help, one when they were able to ask for assistance and be told "yes, we can help you."  This is why we continue to work to provide the best care possible; why we fight each new restriction; why we speak out and share the truth about abortion.  Even when it's hard, even when our allies don't defend us, even when we're threatened. It's worth it. It's worth it to be able to say yes for once. 

We all have the capacity to do what we know is right. We all have the ability to answer the call to help others even when it's hard or scary.  Even when it seems like our small actions won't change anything, they matter.  Your help, and your willingness to stand with us are what have allowed us to help over 4,700 patients since we opened.  Together, we are able to "say yes."  








More publicity for Kansas' most racist politician- Kris Kobach

$
0
0
by Otto

Once again a non-deserving politician, Kris Kobach, got a lot of free publicity from The Wichita Eagle, "Kris Kobach, his views spark intense reactions – from supporters." However, they also printed an article about the difficulty of registering to vote and the thousands of people who's registration has been suspended, "Young voters, Wichitans top Kansas’ suspended voter list."
Not since the days of the civil rights movement has any politician tried so hard to keep people from voting, especially Hispanics. All the experts agree that the anti-voter/anti-fraud laws pushed by Kobach or designed to stop blacks and other minorities from voting. It also works against poor people.
The first article takes a look, mostly at his supporters of Kobach who are mostly white and older. There is little doubt this guy really depends on the angry white vote. His anti-immigrant credentials are well known across the nation. Almost any state that is trying to curb the rights of immigrants and restrict voting can be tied to Kobach's help. He barely has time to do his actual elected job as secretary of state.
That he has so much support in Kansas should surprise no one. Kansas use to be segregated and a major civil rights battle was actually fought in this state, right here in Wichita, the Dockum Drug Store sit-in. It's not surprising we still have racism here and it doesn't surprise me that racist can get a man elected, as they can with Kobach.
Now this man thinks he is governor material. If I have to chose between a very right-wing dumb ass and a very right-wing smart ass, Ill take the dumb one. Governor Sam Brownback is a dumb ass and most Kansans can tell. Still, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker followed almost the same economic strategies as Brownback, but he was able to win re-election with more than 50% of the vote. That he could seriously be considered for the president is disgusting. This is what happens with a smart ass.

The only place that Kobach belongs is in the dumpsters of history, along with racism and anti-immigration fear mongering. If he tries to run, we need a special effort to make sure he doesn't win.




Rep. Elijah Cummings eviscerates GOP chairman for Planned Parenthood salary hypocrisy

$
0
0

The hypocrisy ran rampant during the congressional hearing on Planned Parenthood funding. The disrespect shown to Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards bordered on misogyny.
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chair Jason Chaffetz should be ashamed of the entire hearing. The congressman's attacks on Cecile Richard illustrated that, in fact, his party's war on women is real. It is not made up.
Rep. Chaffetz attacked Cecile Richards for her salary. Richards is the president of a very large organization that services over 2.6 million citizens every year. She travels extensively throughout the country, ensuring that those that would attempt to bring down Planned Parenthood based on false premises are kept in check.
For the rest click here.



Patti Smith sings protest songs against US and Israel policies

$
0
0
Patti Smith - Without Chains (CBGB's Closing Night 2006)

“Qana” Patti Smith

Hospital strike by US Air Forces, in Afghanistan, is a war crime

$
0
0
By Otto
The hospital bombing in Afghanistanis an example of a failed policy of nation building in the Middle east. Years ago some USpeople I knew bragged that the UScould do what the other imperialist nations, such as the Soviet Union and Britain, couldn't do: That is to pacify and occupy Afghanistansuccessfully. They were wrong, pure and simple.
As to the Hospital bombing, according to Yahoo News:

"To be clear, the decision to provide (airstrikes) was a U.S.decision, made within the U.S.chain of command," (Gen. John F. ) Campbellsaid. "The hospital was mistakenly struck. We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility."

I'm sure it was a mistake and no one in the US military really wanted to hit a hospital. However, the relentless campaign against Afghans who are fighting for their countries sovereignty is a crime against humanity in itself. In this sense, the bombing of the hospital WAS a war crime and the US military leaders and politicians need to be held accountable for it. That is not to say that will happen, that is to say it SHOULD happen.
Campbell has blamed the Taliban for the strike. Yet they were nowhere near the hospital. It may have been an accident, but it shows repeated lack of concern those who are forced to live in a USbattlefield. There is never a chance that a US hospital will be hit and US citizens will not lose loved ones due to such "mistakes." Our people are safely tucked away from such horror. Our homes and businesses aren't destroyed. Our old, sick and children are not killed by accident. But we dump such terror on the Afghanistanpeople so that we can play god and impose our US style democracy on those people against their will.
The resurgence of the Taliban, recently, prove that the country was never subdued and the government there is still seen, by the local people, as the phoney puppet it is. Even before the USstarted to reduce the troop strength, there were reports of members of the Afghan military opening fire on their paternal USsoldiers.
Campbell and other military leaders in the USare already planning to send more UStroops to Afghanistanfor the foreseeable future. They have admitted these extra troops may be permanent. They claim they will be needed for the training of Afghanistantroops, but what they don't say is that the Afghan military lacks enthusiasm for the government the UShas bestowed on it. 
It is time to oppose the idea of nation building and the idea of creating US protégées any where in the world. Bring our troops home and don't send anymore anywhere in the Middle east.

Click twice.



Revisiting World War I—so much history- so much time

$
0
0
Nothing like discussing World War I biplanes, rebellions in Kenya and General John "Black Jack" Pershing’s lack of presidential achievement all over cold beer and other fine beverages at Kirby’s, this last Sunday. The four panellists we’ve come to know by their World War I skills came out once again to discuss the important aspects of the war we used to call “The Great War,” before people started to number them. They came to swill suds and bring the intellectual view point to the yearning masses on the causes and results of World War I.
Our guests as usual were Paul Harvey OswaldCasher O’NiellKenya Blue and meRed Rob BloggerWhile sitting around the table, Paul began a conversation on the biplanes used in World War I.

Paul Harvey Oswald: Biplanes did mostly recognisance missions. They made maps of battle fields. Later they tried using pistols and then machine guns. At first the machine gun would hit the airplane blades. Then Roland Georges Garros came up with a idea to synchronize the engine to the machine gun so the bullets always went through the blades and never hit them.

Red Rob Blogger: I can’t imagine trying to fire a machine gun while the propeller blades are going by. You had to know that they would eventually get ruined.

Casher O'Neill: Reminds me of the Indiana Jones movie where Sean Connery shot the tail off the airplane he was in. Gotta be careful firing a gun that's faster than your own reaction time.
Paul Harvey Oswald: It was all a blur (the propeller). Anthony Fokker actually put such gear into use. It was called "interrupter gear."

Red Rob Blogger: Baron Manfred von Richthofen was considered an honourable soldier by many people on both sides. He supposedly shot down 80 planes. I like that his out fit was known as the "Flying Circus."

Paul Harvey Oswald: They say he would not shoot a person once they were down.

Cashier O'Neill: Von Richthofen was an "old school" soldier that believed in honourable battle. And speaking of "Larger Than Life" World War I military heroes, I was always fascinated by "Black Jack" Pershing. I have always wondered why World War I didn't put Pershing in the White House, the way The Revolutionary War put George Washington in the White House, The Civil War put Ulysses Grant in the White House, The Spanish America War put Teddy Roosevelt in the White House:

Red Bob Blogger: The War of 1812 and the Battle Of New Orleans put Andrew Jackson in the White House.

Paul Harvey Oswald: World War II put Eisenhower in the White House.

Cashier O'Neill: Exactly. I mean Pershing was the great American General of the Great War, so why didn't he get to be President? From what I have gleaned from what I have read in various articles and books, Pershing would except his party's nomination, but would not seek it. He was a Republican and said he would not seek it. But Pershing was tied too closely with Democrat Woodrow Wilson for the Republicans to completely trust. Ironically, the Republicans nominated Warren G. Harding as their candidate in 1920, Harding won, and until George W. Bush, most historians agree Harding was the worst President in the history of the United States.

Red Bob Blogger: I was once asked by one of my middle school students if I like war, since I teach so much about it. "NO" I said. In ancient times the winners of a war looted and raped women. They took all that had value and destroyed what they didn't take. They killed anyone they didn't take as a slave. The losers lost everything.


(Latter). Hey look at the TV! I think that rock group called is Hozier.

Did they just say her name was Mary J Blige?

Cashier O'Neill: Yes. She is considered the best RB singer of all time. (A little later we saw Florence + The Machine on the TV.) 

Kenya Blue: I'm planning to visit California where I will see some  internment camps for Japanese in World War II, in Sausalito, CA.

Cashier O'Neill: They had a camp like that in Oklahoma.

Kenya Blue: There were 2,000 to 3,000 African troops involved in WWI. There was also the Maji Maji Rebellion.[i]
There was as faction of Christian guerrillas that were told that they would not die if they where shot with a bullet if they had faith in their religion. It was all a matter of euphoria that motivated those people to fight.
Germany and Belgium made most advances in Africa. The Belgians wanted the Congo (today known as Democratic Republic of the Congo). The Cong had coco, rubber and titanium.




Seated here are Kenya Blue, Paul Harvey OswaldRed Rob Blogger and Casher O’Niell.

Our first product placement: Deep Eddy Lemon Flavoured Vodka. Paul Kroeker was our bar tender that day. He didn't turn the bottle front ways so we could see the label, but that is OK, we hate commercials anyway.




[i]The Maji Maji Rebellion, sometimes called the Maji Maji War (Swahili: Vita vya Maji Maji), was an armed rebellion against German colonial rule in German East Africa (modern-day Tanzania). The war was triggered by a German policy designed to force the indigenous population to grow cotton for export, and lasted from 1905 to 1907. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maji_Maji_Rebellion

Kansas' Brownback takes healthcare from lower-income worker’s children

$
0
0
By Otto

The Kansas Republicans latest action to make up for state budget short falls is to cut its insurance assistance to the children of lower-income state workers by half, according to TheTopeka Capitol Journal.Taking insurance from poor children is hardly any different from taking candy from a baby. It shows, once again. that our Governor Sam Brownback and his ilk in the state legislature have no conscience when it comes to taking from poor children to make up for the tax-break gifts they bestowed on their rich friends and backers. While the tax cuts are not life and death policy for the wealthy, taking away health care could be physically harm the children of poor workers.
In a major act of hypocrisy the governor is planning to let these children enrol in a federal health program — a move made possible through the Affordable Care Act. Yes that is the same Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) that Brownback has vowed to fight down to his dying last breath. He has refused badly needed federal health care grants that would have allowed him to expand Medicaid. He has done his best to keep Obama Care out of Kansas in every way possible. Kansans have been paying for Obama Care but getting practically none of the benefits from it. We can thank Governor Brownback and his supporters for this situation. 
Now Brownback continues to stick to those tax cuts stubbornly, even as the state budget goes down like the Titanic.
So now he rolls back on to Obama Care to get money needed to make up for lower-income state workers’ children’s health insurance.
According to The Topeka Capitol Journal;

“In July, the Health Care Commission — a panel made up of government officials and current and retired workers that governs the State Employee Health Plan — voted to eliminate $2.2 million in funding for Kansas’ Healthy KIDS program.
Healthy KIDS, now nearly a decade old, helps subsidize health insurance for the children of lower-income state workers. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment, the agency that administers the state health plan, said Healthy KIDS has 1,941 participants...
… Plans to allow state workers to enroll in CHIP also follow decisions by Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration earlier this year to decrease state funding to Kansas’ overall CHIP program by $17 million. The administration opted to use an increase in federal funding for the program to make up the $17 million cut, rather than use it to expand CHIP coverage.”

This is the same governor and legislators who blather on and on about the cruelty of killing un-born fetuses and the so called “Planned Parenthood scandal.”
“We’re talking about humans here. Not just pieces of tissue,” Brownback said.
But when it comes to children who are living and breathing—there is no concern at all that these children might get sick or even die from a lack of health care. They don’t count as humans.
We continue to expose the hypocrisy of the Kansas Republicans—or any Republicans for that matter—as they destroy the poor and working people’s way of life in this country.




35 Years Later, John Lennon’s Politics Are as Loud as His Music

$
0
0
I've been a life long fan of John Lennon. I have grown to like his music and his political views over the years. He doesn't have the same exact views as I but as he said:
I’m an artist first and a politician second. -John Lennon
He considered himself a socialist and opposed the Vietnam War. While he wasn't a revolutionary, he was one of the few voices who could be heard, able to counter the culture of President Richard Nixon who expanded the Vietnam War into Kampuchea and he relentlessly attacked youth groups of the day, including many "new left" groups. Lennon was a voice for opposing the Vietnam War.

So I was gad to see this article in Yahoo News-Otto


John Lennon would have been 75 years old this week, on Oct. 9. In the 35 years since his 1980 murder, the world has seen Reaganomics, Monica Lewinsky, Duran Duran, Nirvana, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the rise and fall of Biebermania, the nation’s first black president, Seinfeld, Live Aid, Jon Stewart, Sarah Palin, and Taylor Swift. 
Lennon died before the internet, Facebook, iPhones, and 9/11. He was gunned down while The Jeffersons was a top 10 TV show and three days before Popeye hit movie theaters. 
The world is very different 35 years later, but two things have remained constant: the staying power of Lennon’s music and his politics. And while the Beatles will always be the headline, it’s John Lennon’s political bravery that deserves continued praise. Lennon not only provided the roadmap for every songwriter of the 20th (and 21st) century. He rewrote the book for political activism. Some of Lennon’s political activity may now seem as naive as “Love Me Do,” but his willingness to leverage his fame for matters of world peace and equality is still largely unmatched to this day. U2′s Bono, who has done his own fair share to further artist activism, says Lennon “wrote the blueprint.” He’s right.
For the rest click here.

Ramones - Pet Sematary

Bernie Sanders Explains Why "Socialist" Isn't a Dirty Word


Oppose Medicaid murder by the Kochs, Republicans and Americans for Prosperity

$
0
0
By Otto
In a recent letter to the editor, of  The Wichita Eagle, "Punitive view," JOSEPH KUTTLER challenged a letter to The Wichita Eagle, Oct. 1, “Wrong solution,” by the Americans for Prosperity. The Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is nothing more than one of the Koch brothers (David and Charles) front groups. It is a fake "think tank" of people hired to create the impression that the Koch brothers are more than just the two people. They want it to look like a grass roots organization.
Kutter's letter is about expanding Medicaid and how the AFP opposes that as the "Wrong solution." Kutter, as many serious Kansans, favors expanding Medicaid.
What the AFP said was:

"The only ones engaging in “ideological obstinance and bullying” are those who claim that expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act is needed to save Kansashospitals (“Expansion helps hospitals,” Sept. 25 Eagle Editorial). A better diagnosis of the problem is that Obamacare – which hospitals fought for tooth and nail, mind you – is driving up the cost of health care for everyone involved.
Reams of evidence show Medicaid is both fiscally unsustainable and harmful to patients. Instead of an expansion of Medicaid, we need a system that is affordable for taxpayers and provides high-quality health care to those who’ve fallen on tough times."

What they really mean is 'Let's go back to doing nothing and just let the poor die.' The AFP letter actually said that "Medicaid is harmful to patients." If such statements weren't so mean-spirited it would be laughable.
There have been at least two letters in rebuttal, including Kutter's, to the AFP. There needs to be more. The Koch brothers are pushing their far right-wing ideology through their fake citizens groups, such as A of P. On the surface of it all it is really quite simple. The Kochs follow a 'pull yourself up by the bootstrap and if you can't —do us a favor and die' philosophy.
This is some of the most hateful and mean-spirited attitudes towards poor people this country has seen since the early 1900s and the era of "Social Darwinism"— that is the idea that poorer people are inferior and deserve to die. When they die out they clean out the gene pool. That kind of thinking seems to have returned to the USA, from the late 1800s, by the Republican Party and their rich backers, including the Kochs.
Amazingly, the idea of expanding Medicaid is not about giving health care to the idle poor. Those people are already eligible to get some forms of Medicaid.  No— we are talking about people who are working for minimum wage, people who—although they work—have no medical insurance, benefits and most will die early because they can not afford to go to see a doctor until it is too late. They have no way to pay for doctor visits or the medicines they need if they are sick. Just recently we have seen how pharmaceutical companies jack the price of their medicines as high as 1,000 percent or more. The working pooretch out a dreary existence living from paycheck to paycheck and they have NO benefits. They usually work either full-time or close. Some work more than one job to make ends meet and they still can't afford the high cost of medicine.
According to the Kochs and their ilk, these people do not deserve the simple right to live in decent health as most Americans do. Many will die way before their old age simply because they will only go to a doctor when there ailment is so bad they can no longer stand it. Usually if they have cancer or some other serious disease it will be way to late to save them. They will simply die early.
It is hard to believe that a civilized nation that claims to be the 'worlds police" can be so cold and inhuman. This country has taken on such nations as Democratic People's Republicof Korea (North) Korea and Syria, for their violations of human rights. But even in the DPR Korea they have health care for all.[1] They don't intentionally let their poor die from disease. That is way different from the US. In fact the USis the ONLY country in the fist world that lets its poor die without health care.
This is not just a case of bad policy by the Kochs and their Americans for Prosperity. This is out right murder. To entertain such debate, defending AFP policy, is rubbish. It is an outrage that the entire world should oppose and CONDEMN. It is despicable that anyone in the US would support letting our working poor die of disease.

 DISPICABLE! 


DISPICABLE! 

DISPICABLE! 

[1] Even though the DPR Korea has problems providing health care presently, the government still has a policy of providing health care to all people. That is a major contrast to the US where health care is ONLY for those who can afford it. See: http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Resilience/~/media/3FB4B90DFD794DF7BCF7B9BAC9E3925E.pdf 

Someone is burning black churches in St. Louis, if anyone cares

$
0
0
     As the reports of "another church set on fire" came streaming in, one day after another, on the local news, the thought came to me, "are they black churches?" Naively, I assumed that if these were black congregations being targeted for arson, the local news would mention that and look into the very possible racial motive. Could this be that "war on Christians" conservatives keep warning us about? Then I started hearing from local activists. These were black churches being targeted (six have been burned in a span of ten days). While the St. Louis Post-Dispatch has mentioned that the targeted churches are predominantly black, the local TV news programs have been positively "color blind", simply choosing to omit this very relevant fact. 

     Welcome to post-Michael Brown St. Louis, a city desperately trying to pretend that the racial animosity that was exposed by last year's protests and riots has evaporated into the past; a city in denial. 

      Most white people here are convinced that last year's unrest was "much ado about nothing". While they are quick to point out that the Department of Justice report on Ferguson cleared officer Darren Wilson of criminal wrongdoing, they ignore the rest of the report. The DOJ report also found a pattern of racial profiling, false arrests and excessive force by Ferguson police, along with a municipal court system that seemed to be designed to extract money out of Ferguson's poor and minority residents. This confirms what so many black residents in Ferguson, and the St. Louis region, had been saying for years. The unrest wasn't just about one black man being shot by the police, it was the result of decades of systemic racism and neglect. 

     One year later, not much has changed. Some police departments are looking into buying body cameras, and the state put new limits on how much revenue municipalities can collect through traffic citations and fines, but that's about it. Now that the protests have died down, there appears to be no sense of urgency to deal with the underlying problems that led to the unrest in the first place. 

     Some local TV stations think the answer to our problems are fluff pieces and positive sounding slogans, such as KSDK Channel 5's "STL Together". On the surface, these are attempts to rally the region to come together after a long and draining period of protests and riots. Too often, the slogans, and the accompanying feel good stories, seem like an attempt to slap a happy face on the ugly reality of St. Louis' racial division. Let's all have a group hug and pretend everything is OK now.

     We have a crime wave to worry about now, and the Cardinals' poor performance in the playoffs, not to mention the Rams might be moving to Los Angeles. Oh, and someone is torching black churches, and although we know that white racists in America have a long history of targeting black communities in this way, let's not bring race into the discussion. Hush now! "STL together". 

At last—It's time to take out Commissioner Richard Ranzau

$
0
0
Finally there are citizens in Wichita who are fed up with Sedgwick County Commissioner Richard Ranzau. They are gathering petitions to for a recall election to finally get him out. He is so racist he refuses to answer questions of a reporter, who works both KWCH Channel 12 and Latino Rebels a because she is Hispanic. He really needs to go.
-Otto

See the full artaicle atLatino Rebels.


The Democratic Party is in deep trouble

$
0
0
By Otto

A recently posted article at a site called Vox has driven home a point that many of us already know; the Democratic Party is in peril. The Article is called "Democrats are in denial. Their party is actually in deep trouble."

“And at present it has no plan to save itself,” said the Vox article.

It is all true. The party has been in decline for most of the last 15 years. While the Republican Party has perfected its techniques for winning elections, the Democrats has lagged behind, barely making any attempts to invigorate itself.
The only real fine moment for the Democrats has been their ability to elect Barack Obama and to re-elect him. The Democrats have fought an impressive fight for the white house and a few senate seats. But on offices below that, they are doing miserably.
Several years ago the Republican machine decided it could become better entrenched by wining local and state elections. If they could win these elections they could and would try to push their far-right policies at the local level. It is harder to remove changes state to state than it is at the federal level. The policy has worked.

According to Vox:

“And the vast majority — 70 percent of state legislatures, more than 60 percent of governors, 55 percent of attorneys general and secretaries of state — are in Republicans hands. And, of course, Republicans control both chambers of Congress….
…In what Democrats should take as a further bleak sign, four of the 11 states where they control both houses of the state legislature — Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Illinois — have a Republican governor. This leaves just seven states under unified Democratic Party control.”

This is all bleak for the Democrats. Here in Kansas, in the western first district, the Democratic Party has mostly pulled out leaving most offices un-contested. At local Democrat chapter meetings, I have attended, many people stick with strategies that are proven disastrous. For example people were bragging they didn’t want the Bernie Sanders campaign to go negative. Many Democrats don’t want to go negative. But that works. That is one thing the Koch brothers, with their many special interest, groups do immediately. They trash their opponent and that works. Many local Democrats have bragged that they won’t go negative and they will take the high road. The problem is that those Democrats almost always lose.   
One of the things in this article, and many like it, that I disagree with is that the Democrats are chastised for backing the wrong issues. The Democrats have supported gay rights, immigrant rights, environmental protection and unions. Some Democrats have actually backed away from union support. But the problem isn't that the Democrats have championed the wrong issues — the problem is that they don't support their issues as passionately as the Republicans. The Democrats are very re-active, while the Republicans pick their battles and push for them as hard as they can. The Democrats are always on the defensive. One of the worst night-mares for the Democrats is the unions. Only about 7 percent of workers today are in unions. Nearly a third were in them back in the middle of the 20th century. Some Democrats have actually walked away from union support. Attacking unions has been a major move by Republicans who believe that unions associate themselves with Democrats so the more they kill unions off the easier it is to kill of Democrats.
Two of the biggest issues for Republicans are abortion and gun rights. Actually slightly less than half of the US voters are totally against abortion. But to the Republicans this simple near majority has allowed them to create a holy crusade against those who support abortion rights. They have painted abortion as an evil similar to slavery and murder. A friend of mine went to a precinct meeting for Republicans and found there was a precinct committee person there for one issue only
abortion. Some of these people might not have ever supported Republicans if they were not so hyped up on that one issue. But they are convinced that it is the Republicans who are part of their holy campaign to end abortion.
Guns are another issue. There are those who vote only on the gun issue. The NRA might just as easily be called the National Republican Association rather than the National Riffle Association. They nearly always support Republicans over Democrats. They accuse anyone who votes for any type of gun restrictions as someone trying to "confiscate guns."
The Democrats just simply haven't developed their issues to the point of being able to use them to make or break elections. 
This article is very detailed and it is very accurate. If the Democrats don't wake up and smell the coffee they may end up as just another third party and we may end up living in a one-party country. And a one-party system is just another name for a dictatorship.

To read this article "Democrats are in denial. Their party is actually in deep trouble." just click on the article's title.
   



The Roots of Halloween

$
0
0

The holiday we know as Halloween actually comes from the Celtic holiday Samhain. Scary costumes were meant to keep away evil spirits.

According to MSN.com:

Halloween started as a Celtic festival of Samhain, celebrated on October 31, when the Celts believed the dead returned to the earth. On this day, people gathered to light bonfires, offer sacrifices, and pay homage to the dead, according to History Channel.

Pumpkins were originally carved to keep away evil spirits. They were originally carved in turnips or beets. Pumpkins are a new world fruit and were not known to early Europeans.
-Otto

Other fun facts from MSN.com:

"All Hallow’s Eve" evolved into "All Hallow’s Even," and by the Eighteenth century it was commonly referred to as "Hallowe'en,” according to Business Insider. This crazy change up explains how we eventually came to call the fall holiday Halloween.

Carving jack-o’-lanterns originated in Ireland, but instead of pumpkins, they carved turnipsand beets. Pumpkin carving is an American tradition.

The trick-or-treating hunt didn’t always involve candy. In the 1930s and early 1940s, children got everything from homemade cookies and cake to fruit, nuts, coins, and toys, according to History Channel. No candy on Halloween? Now that’s scary.

The name jack-o’-lanterncame from an old Celtic folk tale about Stingy Jack, who would play tricks on the devil. When Stingy Jack died, the devil gave him a lump of burning coal to light his way in the darkness. Stingy Jack put this light into a turnip to light his way in purgatory.

Ramones - Pet Sematary

Viewing all 1137 articles
Browse latest View live